Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Harrow›…Pinner South ward›P/742/05/DFU
Planning application · Harrow

P/742/05/DFU.

43 Eastern Avenue, Rayners Lane, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 1NW

Full / Other Planning at 43 Eastern Avenue, Rayners Lane, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 1NW, received 23 Mar 2005 — approved on 17 May 2005 (delegated, RM2 Rob McDonald).

Harrow›Pinner South›HA5 1NW›P/742/05/DFU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Approved
Outcome
17 May 2005
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION

Reference
P/742/05/DFU
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA5 1NW
Ward
Council
Received
23 Mar 2005
Validated
7 Apr 2005
Target date
18 May 2005
Decision date
17 May 2005
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
P/742/05/DFU
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA5 1NW
Ward
Council
Received
23 Mar 2005
Validated
7 Apr 2005
Target date
18 May 2005
Decision date
17 May 2005
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 17 May 2005, delegated decision by RM2 Rob McDonald — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Mar 2005
Application received
7 Apr 2005
Application validated
18 May 2005
Statutory target date
17 May 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · RM2 Rob McDonald
23 Mar 2005
Application received
7 Apr 2005
Application validated
18 May 2005
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 May 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · RM2 Rob McDonald

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.