Planning application · Harrow
PL/0114/25.
11 Coledale Drive, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 2QD
Householder at 11 Coledale Drive, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 2QD, received 16 Jan 2025 — refused on 12 Mar 2025 (delegated, Deniss Nikandrovs).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Mar 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
First floor side to rear extension
Reference
PL/0114/25
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA7 2QD
Ward
Council
Received
16 Jan 2025
Validated
22 Jan 2025
Target date
19 Mar 2025
Decision date
12 Mar 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
PL/0114/25
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA7 2QD
Ward
Council
Received
16 Jan 2025
Validated
22 Jan 2025
Target date
19 Mar 2025
Decision date
12 Mar 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 Mar 2025, delegated decision by Deniss Nikandrovs — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
16 Jan 2025
Application received
22 Jan 2025
Application validated
19 Mar 2025
Statutory target date
12 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Deniss Nikandrovs
16 Jan 2025
Application received
22 Jan 2025
Application validated
19 Mar 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
12 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Deniss Nikandrovs
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed two-storey side and rear extension, by reason of the excessive depth beyond the rear
elevation, massing, poor and inconsistent design and incoherent appearance, would result in an overly
dominant, and visually obtrusive form of development, at odds with the prevailing visual character of both the
host property and wider area. As such, the development is contrary to the high quality design aspirations of
the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3.D1 and D11 of The London Plan (2021), and Policy
DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013) and the adopted Supplementary
Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
2
- The proposed extensions would impinge on the horizontal 45 degree line of the adjoining property leading
to loss of light and outlook to the rear bay windows of no. 9 Coledale Drive. As such, the development is
contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy
D3.D1 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1.B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the
Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013) and the adopted Supplementary Planning
Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
1
- The proposed two-storey side and rear extension, by reason of the excessive depth beyond the rear
elevation, massing, poor and inconsistent design and incoherent appearance, would result in an overly
dominant, and visually obtrusive form of development, at odds with the prevailing visual character of both the
host property and wider area. As such, the development is contrary to the high quality design aspirations of
the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3.D1 and D11 of The London Plan (2021), and Policy
DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013) and the adopted Supplementary
Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
2
- The proposed extensions would impinge on the horizontal 45 degree line of the adjoining property leading
to loss of light and outlook to the rear bay windows of no. 9 Coledale Drive. As such, the development is
contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy
D3.D1 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1.B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the
Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013) and the adopted Supplementary Planning
Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
Policies cited
D1D11DM1NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.