Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowKenton East wardPL/0414/24
Planning application · Harrow

PL/0414/24.

620 Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 9NR

Full / Other Planning at 620 Kenton Road, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 9NR, received 19 Feb 2024 — refused on 30 May 2024 (delegated, Luke McBratney).

HarrowKenton EastHA3 9NRPL/0414/24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 May 2024
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of dwelling into two flats (1 x 1 bed & 1 x 2 bed); parking; separate amenity space; boundary treatment; refuse / cycle storage

Reference
PL/0414/24
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 9NR
Council
Received
19 Feb 2024
Validated
4 Apr 2024
Target date
30 May 2024
Decision date
30 May 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/0414/24
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 9NR
Council
Received
19 Feb 2024
Validated
4 Apr 2024
Target date
30 May 2024
Decision date
30 May 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
30 May 2024
Officer Report
30 May 2024
Proposed Cross Section A-A
19 Feb 2024
Proposed Floor Plans
19 Feb 2024
Proposed Elevations
19 Feb 2024
Proposed Floor Plans
19 Feb 2024
Existing Elevations
19 Feb 2024
Flood Risk Assessment
19 Feb 2024
Existing Floor Plans
19 Feb 2024
Location Plan
19 Feb 2024
Decision Notice
30 May 2024
Officer Report
30 May 2024
Proposed Cross Section A-A
19 Feb 2024
Show all 10 rows
Proposed Floor Plans
19 Feb 2024
Proposed Elevations
19 Feb 2024
Proposed Floor Plans
19 Feb 2024
Existing Elevations
19 Feb 2024
Flood Risk Assessment
19 Feb 2024
Existing Floor Plans
19 Feb 2024
Location Plan
19 Feb 2024

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 30 May 2024, delegated decision by Luke McBratney — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Feb 2024
Application received
4 Apr 2024
Application validated
30 May 2024
Statutory target date
30 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Luke McBratney
19 Feb 2024
Application received
4 Apr 2024
Application validated
30 May 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
30 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Luke McBratney

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed development, by reason of its awkward layout; poor outlook and lack of access to natural daylight/sunlight to the kitchen and dining area of the ground floor flat would result in a substandard quality of living accommodation for the potential future occupiers, to the detriment of their residential amenity, contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policy D6 of The London Plan (2021), policies DM1 and DM 26 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013), the Technical Housing Standards Nationally Described Space Standards (2015), the Mayor of London Supplementary Planning Guidance (2016) and the adopted Residential Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2010).
2
- The proposal, by reason of an unsatisfactory Flood Risk Assessment, fails to provide adequate flood data to demonstrate that the proposed development would result in a net reduction in flood risk, be resistant and resilient to flooding, would not exacerbate the risk of flooding within the site or increase the risk and consequences of flooding elsewhere or provide a dry means of escape for the users of the site, to the potential detriment of the safety of future occupiers of the development and elsewhere in terms of flood risk. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), policy SI 12 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1 U of Harrow Core Strategy (2012) policies DM 9 and DM10 of the Harrow Development Management Polices Local Plan (2013).
1
- The proposed development, by reason of its awkward layout; poor outlook and lack of access to natural daylight/sunlight to the kitchen and dining area of the ground floor flat would result in a substandard quality of living accommodation for the potential future occupiers, to the detriment of their residential amenity, contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policy D6 of The London Plan (2021), policies DM1 and DM 26 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013), the Technical Housing Standards Nationally Described Space Standards (2015), the Mayor of London Supplementary Planning Guidance (2016) and the adopted Residential Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2010).
2
- The proposal, by reason of an unsatisfactory Flood Risk Assessment, fails to provide adequate flood data to demonstrate that the proposed development would result in a net reduction in flood risk, be resistant and resilient to flooding, would not exacerbate the risk of flooding within the site or increase the risk and consequences of flooding elsewhere or provide a dry means of escape for the users of the site, to the potential detriment of the safety of future occupiers of the development and elsewhere in terms of flood risk. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), policy SI 12 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1 U of Harrow Core Strategy (2012) policies DM 9 and DM10 of the Harrow Development Management Polices Local Plan (2013).
Policies cited
D6DM1DM26NPPFSI12DM9DM10

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.