Planning application · Harrow
PL/0430/26.
UNIT 1 Chantry Place, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 6NY
Full / Other Planning at UNIT 1 Chantry Place, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 6NY, received 17 Feb 2026 — refused on 16 Apr 2026 (delegated, Catriona Cooke).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Apr 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Change of use of part Upper Floor from (Class B2) to (Class B2/E)
Reference
PL/0430/26
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 6NY
Ward
Council
Received
17 Feb 2026
Validated
19 Feb 2026
Target date
16 Apr 2026
Decision date
16 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
PL/0430/26
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 6NY
Ward
Council
Received
17 Feb 2026
Validated
19 Feb 2026
Target date
16 Apr 2026
Decision date
16 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 16 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Catriona Cooke — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
17 Feb 2026
Application received
19 Feb 2026
Application validated
16 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
16 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Catriona Cooke
17 Feb 2026
Application received
19 Feb 2026
Application validated
16 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
16 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Catriona Cooke
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed change of use would result in a net loss of industrial floorspace from the borough stocks, for
which there is an evidenced strategic need to retain. The submitted information is unable to justify this loss of
floorspace. Therefore the proposal is contrary to Policy E4 of the London Plan (2021), and Policy LE3 of the
Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
2
- Insufficient information has been submitted to the Local Planning Authority to demonstrate that the
proposed Use Class E(d) would be a compatible use with the adjoining industrial uses within the Chantry
Place Industrial estate, and not to the detriment of existing occupiers within the Industrial Park and
neighbouring residents. The proposal therefore fails to accord with policies GR1 and LE3 of the Harrow Local
Plan (2021-2041).
1
- The proposed change of use would result in a net loss of industrial floorspace from the borough stocks, for
which there is an evidenced strategic need to retain. The submitted information is unable to justify this loss of
floorspace. Therefore the proposal is contrary to Policy E4 of the London Plan (2021), and Policy LE3 of the
Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
2
- Insufficient information has been submitted to the Local Planning Authority to demonstrate that the
proposed Use Class E(d) would be a compatible use with the adjoining industrial uses within the Chantry
Place Industrial estate, and not to the detriment of existing occupiers within the Industrial Park and
neighbouring residents. The proposal therefore fails to accord with policies GR1 and LE3 of the Harrow Local
Plan (2021-2041).
Policies cited
E4LE3GR1
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.