Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Harrow›…Kenton West ward›PL/0486/25
Planning application · Harrow

PL/0486/25.

10 Daintry Close, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8PT

Lawful Development Certificate at 10 Daintry Close, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8PT, received 26 Feb 2025 — refused on 23 Apr 2025 (delegated, Lee Connor).

Harrow›Kenton West›HA3 8PT›PL/0486/25
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Apr 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Certificate of Lawful Development (Proposed): Single storey rear extension

Reference
PL/0486/25
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Proposed
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 8PT
Ward
Council
Received
26 Feb 2025
Target date
23 Apr 2025
Decision date
23 Apr 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
PL/0486/25
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Proposed
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 8PT
Ward
Council
Received
26 Feb 2025
Target date
23 Apr 2025
Decision date
23 Apr 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
23 Apr 2025
Officer Report
18 Apr 2025
Decision Notice
23 Apr 2025
Officer Report
18 Apr 2025

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 23 Apr 2025, delegated decision by Lee Connor — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Feb 2025
Application received
23 Apr 2025
Statutory target date
23 Apr 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Lee Connor
26 Feb 2025
Application received
23 Apr 2025
Statutory target date
23 Apr 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Lee Connor

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.