Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowMarlborough wardPL/0487/26
Planning application · Harrow

PL/0487/26.

87 Welldon Crescent, Harrow, HA1 1QW

Full / Other Planning at 87 Welldon Crescent, Harrow, HA1 1QW, received 24 Feb 2026 — refused on 27 May 2026 (delegated, Marcus Boddy).

HarrowMarlboroughHA1 1QWPL/0487/26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 May 2026
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of dwelling into two flats (2 x 2 beds); single storey front extension; separate amenity space; landscaping; bin and cycle stores

Reference
PL/0487/26
Type
Full Planning Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA1 1QW
Council
Received
24 Feb 2026
Validated
26 Feb 2026
Target date
27 May 2026
Decision date
27 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/0487/26
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA1 1QW
Council
Received
24 Feb 2026
Validated
26 Feb 2026
Target date
27 May 2026
Decision date
27 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
27 May 2026
planning/uploads/118474401779885828:: ::PL 0487 26 87 Welldo
27 May 2026
Officer Report
27 May 2026
Proposed Plans
20 Apr 2026
CIL
25 Feb 2026
Reasonable Exception Statement
25 Feb 2026
Flood Risk Assessment
25 Feb 2026
Design & Access Statement
25 Feb 2026
Existing Floor Plan and Elevations
25 Feb 2026
Application Form Redacted
25 Feb 2026
Decision Notice
27 May 2026
planning/uploads/118474401779885828:: ::PL 0487 26 87 Welldo
27 May 2026
Officer Report
27 May 2026
Show all 10 rows
Proposed Plans
20 Apr 2026
CIL
25 Feb 2026
Reasonable Exception Statement
25 Feb 2026
Flood Risk Assessment
25 Feb 2026
Design & Access Statement
25 Feb 2026
Existing Floor Plan and Elevations
25 Feb 2026
Application Form Redacted
25 Feb 2026

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 May 2026, delegated decision by Marcus Boddy — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Feb 2026
Application received
26 Feb 2026
Application validated
27 May 2026
Statutory target date
27 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Marcus Boddy
24 Feb 2026
Application received
26 Feb 2026
Application validated
27 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Marcus Boddy

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposal, by reason of the lack of a family sized homes with three or more bedrooms, would fail to achieve an appropriate housing mix, having regard to the location of the site and its surroundings as well as the evidence of local need which identifies the need for more larger family sized units and would fail to contribute to the creation of inclusive and mixed communities, contrary to the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), policies HO1 and HO2 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
1
- The proposal, by reason of the lack of a family sized homes with three or more bedrooms, would fail to achieve an appropriate housing mix, having regard to the location of the site and its surroundings as well as the evidence of local need which identifies the need for more larger family sized units and would fail to contribute to the creation of inclusive and mixed communities, contrary to the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), policies HO1 and HO2 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
Policies cited
HO1HO2NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.