Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowKenton West wardPL/0700/26
Planning application · Harrow

PL/0700/26.

43 Kingshill Avenue, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8JT

Householder at 43 Kingshill Avenue, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8JT, received 13 Mar 2026 — refused on 15 May 2026 (delegated, Marcus Boddy).

HarrowKenton WestHA3 8JTPL/0700/26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 May 2026
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Two storey side and rear extension; single storey rear extension; alterations to roof to form end gable and rear dormer; installation of two rooflights in front roof slope

Reference
PL/0700/26
Type
Householder
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 8JT
Council
Received
13 Mar 2026
Validated
20 Mar 2026
Target date
15 May 2026
Decision date
15 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/0700/26
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 8JT
Council
Received
13 Mar 2026
Validated
20 Mar 2026
Target date
15 May 2026
Decision date
15 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
15 May 2026
Officer Report
14 May 2026
Reasonable Exception Statement
22 Mar 2026
Flood Risk Assessment
22 Mar 2026
location plan
17 Mar 2026
Proposed & existing floor plans & elevations
17 Mar 2026
Block plan of the site
17 Mar 2026
Application Form Redacted
17 Mar 2026
Decision Notice
15 May 2026
Officer Report
14 May 2026
Reasonable Exception Statement
22 Mar 2026
Show all 8 rows
Flood Risk Assessment
22 Mar 2026
location plan
17 Mar 2026
Proposed & existing floor plans & elevations
17 Mar 2026
Block plan of the site
17 Mar 2026
Application Form Redacted
17 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 15 May 2026, delegated decision by Marcus Boddy — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Mar 2026
Application received
20 Mar 2026
Application validated
15 May 2026
Statutory target date
15 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Marcus Boddy
13 Mar 2026
Application received
20 Mar 2026
Application validated
15 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
15 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Marcus Boddy

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed two storey side extension, together with the proposed gable end roof, and the intersection created between the two, would result in an inappropriate roof form which is considered an unduly obtrusive, bulky and incongruous addition to the original dwellinghouse which would fail to respect the character and proportions of the dwellinghouse and the visual amenities of the locality and therefore would be contrary to the high quality design aspiration of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 (D.1 and D.11) of The London Plan (2021), Policies GR1 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041) and the relevant provisions of the adopted Harrow Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide (2010).
1
- The proposed two storey side extension, together with the proposed gable end roof, and the intersection created between the two, would result in an inappropriate roof form which is considered an unduly obtrusive, bulky and incongruous addition to the original dwellinghouse which would fail to respect the character and proportions of the dwellinghouse and the visual amenities of the locality and therefore would be contrary to the high quality design aspiration of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 (D.1 and D.11) of The London Plan (2021), Policies GR1 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041) and the relevant provisions of the adopted Harrow Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide (2010).
Policies cited
GR1NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.