Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowGreenhill wardPL/0744/26
Planning application · Harrow

PL/0744/26.

28 Elmwood Avenue, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8AH

Householder at 28 Elmwood Avenue, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 8AH, received 18 Mar 2026 — refused on 13 May 2026 (delegated, Marcus Boddy).

HarrowGreenhillHA3 8AHPL/0744/26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 May 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single and two storey rear extension; Rear dormer

Reference
PL/0744/26
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 8AH
Council
Received
18 Mar 2026
Target date
13 May 2026
Decision date
13 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/0744/26
Type
Householder
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 8AH
Council
Received
18 Mar 2026
Target date
13 May 2026
Decision date
13 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
13 May 2026
Officer Report
11 May 2026
CIL
19 Mar 2026
Proposed Floor Plans & Elevation(s)
19 Mar 2026
location plan
19 Mar 2026
Existing floor Plans & Elevations
19 Mar 2026
Application Form Redacted
19 Mar 2026
Decision Notice
13 May 2026
Officer Report
11 May 2026
CIL
19 Mar 2026
Show all 7 rows
Proposed Floor Plans & Elevation(s)
19 Mar 2026
location plan
19 Mar 2026
Existing floor Plans & Elevations
19 Mar 2026
Application Form Redacted
19 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 13 May 2026, delegated decision by Marcus Boddy — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Mar 2026
Application received
13 May 2026
Statutory target date
13 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Marcus Boddy
18 Mar 2026
Application received
13 May 2026
Statutory target date
13 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Marcus Boddy

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed first floor rear extension would result in an inappropriate roof form that would intersect the proposed rear dormer creating a development considered to be an unduly obtrusive and incongruous addition to the original dwellinghouse resulting in cumulative overdevelopment of the site, failing to respect the character and proportions of the dwellinghouse and the visual amenities of the locality. The proposal would therefore be contrary to the high quality design aspiration of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3 of The London Plan (2021), Policies GR1of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041) and the relevant provisions of the adopted Harrow Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide (2010).
1
- The proposed first floor rear extension would result in an inappropriate roof form that would intersect the proposed rear dormer creating a development considered to be an unduly obtrusive and incongruous addition to the original dwellinghouse resulting in cumulative overdevelopment of the site, failing to respect the character and proportions of the dwellinghouse and the visual amenities of the locality. The proposal would therefore be contrary to the high quality design aspiration of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3 of The London Plan (2021), Policies GR1of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041) and the relevant provisions of the adopted Harrow Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide (2010).
Policies cited
D3NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.