Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowRoxeth wardPL/1492/24
Planning application · Harrow

PL/1492/24.

7 Doncaster Gardens, Northolt, Harrow, UB5 4BN

Householder at 7 Doncaster Gardens, Northolt, Harrow, UB5 4BN, received 30 May 2024 — refused on 22 Jul 2024 (delegated, Deborah Ewenla).

HarrowRoxethUB5 4BNPL/1492/24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 Jul 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Rear dormer; installation of three rooflights in front roofslope

Reference
PL/1492/24
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 4BN
Ward
Council
Received
30 May 2024
Target date
25 Jul 2024
Decision date
22 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/1492/24
Type
Householder
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 4BN
Ward
Council
Received
30 May 2024
Target date
25 Jul 2024
Decision date
22 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
22 Jul 2024
Officer Report
19 Jul 2024
Spatial analysis results (Created from GIS)
31 May 2024
Reasonable Exception Statement
31 May 2024
Proposed Elevations
31 May 2024
Proposed Elevations
31 May 2024
Proposed floor plans
31 May 2024
Existing elevations & floor plans/location
31 May 2024
CIL form
31 May 2024
SiteLocation.geojson
31 May 2024
Decision Notice
22 Jul 2024
Officer Report
19 Jul 2024
Spatial analysis results (Created from GIS)
31 May 2024
Show all 10 rows
Reasonable Exception Statement
31 May 2024
Proposed Elevations
31 May 2024
Proposed Elevations
31 May 2024
Proposed floor plans
31 May 2024
Existing elevations & floor plans/location
31 May 2024
CIL form
31 May 2024
SiteLocation.geojson
31 May 2024

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 22 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Deborah Ewenla — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
30 May 2024
Application received
25 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
22 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Deborah Ewenla
30 May 2024
Application received
25 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
22 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Deborah Ewenla

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed rear roof dormer, by reason of its excessive cumulative scale and massing would result in an overly dominant, incongruous, bulky and visually obtrusive form of development, at odds with the prevailing visual character of both the host property and wider area, contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policy D3.D1 and D11 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CSB of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013) and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
1
- The proposed rear roof dormer, by reason of its excessive cumulative scale and massing would result in an overly dominant, incongruous, bulky and visually obtrusive form of development, at odds with the prevailing visual character of both the host property and wider area, contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policy D3.D1 and D11 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CSB of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013) and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
Policies cited
D1D11DM1NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.