Planning application · Harrow
PL/1607/24.
Flat 7, BERMUDA HOUSE Mount Park Road, Harrow On The Hill, Harrow, HA1 3XH
Full / Other Planning at Flat 7, BERMUDA HOUSE Mount Park Road, Harrow On The Hill, Harrow, HA1 3XH, received 12 Jun 2024 — refused on 23 Apr 2026 (delegated, Mehdi Rezaie).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Apr 2026
97 wks
Decision time
89 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Replacement windows to front and rear elevations (Retrospective)
Reference
PL/1607/24
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
12 Jun 2024
Validated
5 Feb 2025
Target date
2 Apr 2025
Decision date
23 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
PL/1607/24
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
12 Jun 2024
Validated
5 Feb 2025
Target date
2 Apr 2025
Decision date
23 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 23 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Mehdi Rezaie — 97 weeks from submission (89 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
12 Jun 2024
Application received
5 Feb 2025
Application validated
2 Apr 2025
Statutory target date
23 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Mehdi Rezaie
12 Jun 2024
Application received
5 Feb 2025
Application validated
2 Apr 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
23 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Mehdi Rezaie
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed replacement windows to front and rear elevations, would in officers’ opinion adversely
impact the character and appearance of the host property and fail to preserve or enhance the character and
appearance of the Mount Park Estate Conservation Area and/or fail to respect the setting of the Listed
Buildings and set a dangerous precedent. As such, the proposal would conflict the requirements of Policies
D1 and HC1C of the ‘London Plan’ (2021), Policies GR1 and HE1 of the London Borough of Harrow Local
Plan (2021 -2041), guidance contained within Para’s 212, 213, 215, 216 and 219 of the ‘National Planning
Policy Framework’ (2024) and ‘The Setting of Heritage Assets Historic Environment Good Practice Advice in
Planning Note 3’ (Second Edition), London Borough of Harrow Residential Design Guide Supplementary
Planning Document (2010) and Mount Park Estate Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Strategy
(2008).
1
- The proposed replacement windows to front and rear elevations, would in officers’ opinion adversely
impact the character and appearance of the host property and fail to preserve or enhance the character and
appearance of the Mount Park Estate Conservation Area and/or fail to respect the setting of the Listed
Buildings and set a dangerous precedent. As such, the proposal would conflict the requirements of Policies
D1 and HC1C of the ‘London Plan’ (2021), Policies GR1 and HE1 of the London Borough of Harrow Local
Plan (2021 -2041), guidance contained within Para’s 212, 213, 215, 216 and 219 of the ‘National Planning
Policy Framework’ (2024) and ‘The Setting of Heritage Assets Historic Environment Good Practice Advice in
Planning Note 3’ (Second Edition), London Borough of Harrow Residential Design Guide Supplementary
Planning Document (2010) and Mount Park Estate Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Strategy
(2008).
Policies cited
GR1HE1NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.