Planning application · Harrow
PL/1623/24.
102 Hunters Grove, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 9AQ
Householder at 102 Hunters Grove, Kenton, Harrow, HA3 9AQ, received 13 Jun 2024 — refused on 8 Aug 2024 (delegated, Lee Connor).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Aug 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
First floor side to rear extension including pitched roof to front porch; external alterations
Reference
PL/1623/24
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 9AQ
Ward
Council
Received
13 Jun 2024
Target date
8 Aug 2024
Decision date
8 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
PL/1623/24
Type
Householder
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 9AQ
Ward
Council
Received
13 Jun 2024
Target date
8 Aug 2024
Decision date
8 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 8 Aug 2024, delegated decision by Lee Connor — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
13 Jun 2024
Application received
8 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
8 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Lee Connor
13 Jun 2024
Application received
8 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
8 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Lee Connor
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed two storey side to rear extension, by reason of its siting adjacent to the site boundary and
lack of set back of the first floor side element and lack of roof set down, would result in a cramped and
obtrusive form of development. This would lead to loss of openness in this prominent corner site and fail to
respect the character and appearance of the site and the prevailing pattern of development in the local area.
As such, the works would be contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy
Framework (2023), Policy D3 D.1 and D.11 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1.B of the Harrow
Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013) and
the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
1
- The proposed two storey side to rear extension, by reason of its siting adjacent to the site boundary and
lack of set back of the first floor side element and lack of roof set down, would result in a cramped and
obtrusive form of development. This would lead to loss of openness in this prominent corner site and fail to
respect the character and appearance of the site and the prevailing pattern of development in the local area.
As such, the works would be contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy
Framework (2023), Policy D3 D.1 and D.11 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1.B of the Harrow
Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013) and
the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
Policies cited
London Plan 11DM1NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.