Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowMarlborough wardPL/1738/24
Planning application · Harrow

PL/1738/24.

20 Rosslyn Crescent, Harrow, HA1 2RZ

Full / Other Planning at 20 Rosslyn Crescent, Harrow, HA1 2RZ, received 25 Jun 2024 — refused on 10 Oct 2024 (delegated, Marcus Boddy).

HarrowMarlboroughHA1 2RZPL/1738/24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 Oct 2024
15 wks
Decision time
7 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension

Reference
PL/1738/24
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Not recorded
Case officer
Postcode
HA1 2RZ
Council
Received
25 Jun 2024
Validated
21 Aug 2024
Target date
16 Oct 2024
Decision date
10 Oct 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/1738/24
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Case officer
Postcode
HA1 2RZ
Council
Received
25 Jun 2024
Validated
21 Aug 2024
Target date
16 Oct 2024
Decision date
10 Oct 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
10 Oct 2024
Officer Report
8 Oct 2024
Flood Risk Assessment
20 Aug 2024
Planning Constraints
27 Jun 2024
Spatial analysis results (Created from GIS)
27 Jun 2024
Proposed & Existing Elevation, Floor Plan, Location Plan & A
27 Jun 2024
Proposed & Existing Elevation, Floor Plan, Location Plan & A
27 Jun 2024
Proposed & Existing Elevation, Floor Plan, Location Plan & A
27 Jun 2024
Design and Access Statement
27 Jun 2024
Application Form Redacted
27 Jun 2024
Decision Notice
10 Oct 2024
Officer Report
8 Oct 2024
Flood Risk Assessment
20 Aug 2024
Show all 10 rows
Planning Constraints
27 Jun 2024
Spatial analysis results (Created from GIS)
27 Jun 2024
Proposed & Existing Elevation, Floor Plan, Location Plan & A
27 Jun 2024
Proposed & Existing Elevation, Floor Plan, Location Plan & A
27 Jun 2024
Proposed & Existing Elevation, Floor Plan, Location Plan & A
27 Jun 2024
Design and Access Statement
27 Jun 2024
Application Form Redacted
27 Jun 2024

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 10 Oct 2024, delegated decision by Marcus Boddy — 15 weeks from submission (7 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Jun 2024
Application received
21 Aug 2024
Application validated
16 Oct 2024
Statutory target date
10 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Marcus Boddy
25 Jun 2024
Application received
21 Aug 2024
Application validated
16 Oct 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
10 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Marcus Boddy

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed development is located within surface water flood zone 3a and in the absence of a satisfactory Flood Risk Assessment, it has not been demonstrated that the proposed development would not exacerbate the risk of flooding within the site or increase the risk and consequences of flooding elsewhere, contrary to National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policy SI 12 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1.U of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012) and Policies DM9 and DM10 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013).
1
- The proposed development is located within surface water flood zone 3a and in the absence of a satisfactory Flood Risk Assessment, it has not been demonstrated that the proposed development would not exacerbate the risk of flooding within the site or increase the risk and consequences of flooding elsewhere, contrary to National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policy SI 12 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1.U of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012) and Policies DM9 and DM10 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013).
Policies cited
SI12DM9DM10NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.