Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowCanons wardPL/1771/25
Planning application · Harrow

PL/1771/25.

2 Lake View, Edgware, Harrow, HA8 7RU

Householder at 2 Lake View, Edgware, Harrow, HA8 7RU, received 7 Jul 2025 — refused on 3 Nov 2025 (delegated, Kanchan Sharma).

HarrowCanonsHA8 7RUPL/1771/25
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Nov 2025
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single and two storey rear extension, Alterations to roof to form end gable and rear dormer infill extension

Reference
PL/1771/25
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA8 7RU
Ward
Council
Received
7 Jul 2025
Validated
23 Jul 2025
Target date
3 Nov 2025
Decision date
3 Nov 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/1771/25
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA8 7RU
Ward
Council
Received
7 Jul 2025
Validated
23 Jul 2025
Target date
3 Nov 2025
Decision date
3 Nov 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
3 Nov 2025
Consultation response ( Drainage)
3 Nov 2025
Officer Report
17 Sept 2025
Drainage Consultation response
9 Sept 2025
Conservation Officer Consultation response
9 Sept 2025
Flood Risk Assessment
23 Jul 2025
Fire Safety - Reasonable Exception Statement
23 Jul 2025
Proposed block Plan
7 Jul 2025
CIL
7 Jul 2025
Heritage/Planning statement
7 Jul 2025
Decision Notice
3 Nov 2025
Consultation response ( Drainage)
3 Nov 2025
Officer Report
17 Sept 2025
Show all 10 rows
Drainage Consultation response
9 Sept 2025
Conservation Officer Consultation response
9 Sept 2025
Flood Risk Assessment
23 Jul 2025
Fire Safety - Reasonable Exception Statement
23 Jul 2025
Proposed block Plan
7 Jul 2025
CIL
7 Jul 2025
Heritage/Planning statement
7 Jul 2025

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 Nov 2025, delegated decision by Kanchan Sharma — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
7 Jul 2025
Application received
23 Jul 2025
Application validated
3 Nov 2025
Statutory target date
3 Nov 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kanchan Sharma
7 Jul 2025
Application received
23 Jul 2025
Application validated
3 Nov 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 Nov 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kanchan Sharma

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed two storey rear extension by reason of its bulk and scale would create an incongruous feature which would be obtrusive and disruptive to the symmetry of the pair of semi-detached dwellings and would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area and will be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3.D(7) and D3.D(11) of The London Plan (2021), Policy CS1.B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Development Management Plan Local Policies (2013) and the Adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
1
- The proposed two storey rear extension by reason of its bulk and scale would create an incongruous feature which would be obtrusive and disruptive to the symmetry of the pair of semi-detached dwellings and would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area and will be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3.D(7) and D3.D(11) of The London Plan (2021), Policy CS1.B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Development Management Plan Local Policies (2013) and the Adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
Policies cited
DM1NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.