Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowRoxeth wardPL/1937/24
Planning application · Harrow

PL/1937/24.

78 The Heights, Northolt, Harrow, UB5 4BP

Householder at 78 The Heights, Northolt, Harrow, UB5 4BP, received 15 Jul 2024 — refused on 9 Sep 2024 (delegated, Deborah Ewenla).

HarrowRoxethUB5 4BPPL/1937/24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
9 Sep 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension

Reference
PL/1937/24
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 4BP
Ward
Council
Received
15 Jul 2024
Target date
9 Sep 2024
Decision date
9 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/1937/24
Type
Householder
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
UB5 4BP
Ward
Council
Received
15 Jul 2024
Target date
9 Sep 2024
Decision date
9 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
9 Sept 2024
Officer Report
2 Sept 2024
Reasonable Exception Statement
18 Jul 2024
Proposed Elevations & plans
18 Jul 2024
Existing elevations & floor plans
18 Jul 2024
SiteLocation.geojson
18 Jul 2024
Location plan
18 Jul 2024
Application Form Redacted
18 Jul 2024
Decision Notice
9 Sept 2024
Officer Report
2 Sept 2024
Reasonable Exception Statement
18 Jul 2024
Show all 8 rows
Proposed Elevations & plans
18 Jul 2024
Existing elevations & floor plans
18 Jul 2024
SiteLocation.geojson
18 Jul 2024
Location plan
18 Jul 2024
Application Form Redacted
18 Jul 2024

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 9 Sep 2024, delegated decision by Deborah Ewenla — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Jul 2024
Application received
9 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
9 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Deborah Ewenla
15 Jul 2024
Application received
9 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
9 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Deborah Ewenla

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposal, by reason of 4.5m rearward projection and siting, would be overbearing, visually obtrusive and would be detrimental to the amenities of the neighbouring occupiers at No.76 The Heights, resulting in an undue loss of outlook and light, increase sense of enclosure and visual amenity, contrary to Policy DM1 B (a), DM1 C, DM1 D (d), (e) and (f) of the Development Management Policies Local Plan document (2013) and the relevant provisions of the adopted Harrow Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide (2010).
1
- The proposal, by reason of 4.5m rearward projection and siting, would be overbearing, visually obtrusive and would be detrimental to the amenities of the neighbouring occupiers at No.76 The Heights, resulting in an undue loss of outlook and light, increase sense of enclosure and visual amenity, contrary to Policy DM1 B (a), DM1 C, DM1 D (d), (e) and (f) of the Development Management Policies Local Plan document (2013) and the relevant provisions of the adopted Harrow Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide (2010).

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.