Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowWealdstone North wardPL/2018/24
Planning application · Harrow

PL/2018/24.

Fancy & Lovely Food Ltd, 215 - 219 High Road, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 5EE

Full / Other Planning at Fancy & Lovely Food Ltd, 215 - 219 High Road, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 5EE, received 22 Jul 2024 — refused on 17 Feb 2026 (delegated, Katie Parkins1).

HarrowWealdstone NorthHA3 5EEPL/2018/24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Feb 2026
82 wks
Decision time
74 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of existing steel pergola, proposed installation of cladding and retractable roof to the existing steel pergola

Reference
PL/2018/24
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 5EE
Council
Received
22 Jul 2024
Validated
12 Aug 2024
Target date
31 Jul 2025
Decision date
17 Feb 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/2018/24
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 5EE
Council
Received
22 Jul 2024
Validated
12 Aug 2024
Target date
31 Jul 2025
Decision date
17 Feb 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
17 Feb 2026
Officer Report
7 Oct 2024
Pre-Existing Floor Elevation Plans & Existing Elevation/Loca
13 Aug 2024
Application Form Redacted
25 Jul 2024
Decision Notice
17 Feb 2026
Officer Report
7 Oct 2024
Pre-Existing Floor Elevation Plans & Existing Elevation/Loca
13 Aug 2024
Show all 4 rows
Application Form Redacted
25 Jul 2024

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 Feb 2026, delegated decision by Katie Parkins1 — 82 weeks from submission (74 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Jul 2024
Application received
12 Aug 2024
Application validated
31 Jul 2025
Statutory target date
17 Feb 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Katie Parkins1
22 Jul 2024
Application received
12 Aug 2024
Application validated
31 Jul 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Feb 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Katie Parkins1

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- Insufficient information was submitted in relation to the external materials, and therefore it has not been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority that a high quality development would be achieved, which is considered essential given the sites wide and prominent position along a main road. Therefore, the proposed development is contrary to the high quality deign aspirations of The National Planning Policy Framework (2024), policy D3.D1, D3.D10 and D3.D12 of The London Plan (2021), policy CS1 of The Harrow Core Strategy (2021), policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan 2013.
1
- Insufficient information was submitted in relation to the external materials, and therefore it has not been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority that a high quality development would be achieved, which is considered essential given the sites wide and prominent position along a main road. Therefore, the proposed development is contrary to the high quality deign aspirations of The National Planning Policy Framework (2024), policy D3.D1, D3.D10 and D3.D12 of The London Plan (2021), policy CS1 of The Harrow Core Strategy (2021), policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan 2013.
Policies cited
D12CS1DM1NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.