Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Front boundary treatment with brick walls, coping stones and iron gates/railings to No.66 and 68 High Street; external iron balcony and spiral staircase to rear of No.66; replacement windows and doors with timber framed double glazing to front and rear of No.66; new timber framed double glazed windo
Refused on 6 Nov 2024, delegated decision by Jack Wride — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
7 Aug 2024
Application received
11 Sep 2024
Application validated
6 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
6 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jack Wride
7 Aug 2024
Application received
11 Sep 2024
Application validated
6 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
6 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jack Wride
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- In the absence of sufficient justification or supporting evidence, the proposed original commercial character
of these converted properties by reason of an uncharacteristic residential style boundary treatment; results in
the loss of historic features, such as the original centre door of no. 66 and Luxcrete glass blocks; and
introduces an unacceptable modern double glazing style to the front of the property. This is considered
harmful to the character and appearance of the Harrow on the Hill Village Conservation Area, and contrary to
the high-quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), Policies D3 and HC1 of
the London Plan (2021); CS.1 of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policies DM1 and DM7 of the
Development Management Plan Local Policies (2013); the adopted Supplementary Planning Document:
Residential Design Guide (2010) and Harrow on the Hill Village Conservation Area Appraisal (2008).
1
- In the absence of sufficient justification or supporting evidence, the proposed original commercial character
of these converted properties by reason of an uncharacteristic residential style boundary treatment; results in
the loss of historic features, such as the original centre door of no. 66 and Luxcrete glass blocks; and
introduces an unacceptable modern double glazing style to the front of the property. This is considered
harmful to the character and appearance of the Harrow on the Hill Village Conservation Area, and contrary to
the high-quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), Policies D3 and HC1 of
the London Plan (2021); CS.1 of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policies DM1 and DM7 of the
Development Management Plan Local Policies (2013); the adopted Supplementary Planning Document:
Residential Design Guide (2010) and Harrow on the Hill Village Conservation Area Appraisal (2008).
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.