Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowHarrow on the Hill wardPL/2276/25
Planning application · Harrow

PL/2276/25.

CHYNGTON COURT London Road, Harrow

Full / Other Planning at CHYNGTON COURT London Road, Harrow, received 1 Sep 2025 — refused on 21 May 2026 (delegated, Helen Harris).

HarrowHarrow on the HillPL/2276/25
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 May 2026
37 wks
Decision time
29 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
36
Documents
36 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction to create third floor level for four dwellings (4 x 1 beds); external alterations

Reference
PL/2276/25
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
1 Sep 2025
Validated
14 Oct 2025
Target date
13 Feb 2026
Decision date
21 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/2276/25
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
1 Sep 2025
Validated
14 Oct 2025
Target date
13 Feb 2026
Decision date
21 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
21 May 2026
Officer Report
18 May 2026
Arb Report
13 Jan 2026
Arboricultural Consultee Response Email
5 Dec 2025
Ecologist Consultee Response Email
28 Nov 2025
Landscape Consultee Response
27 Nov 2025
Drainage-Infrastructure Consultee Response
27 Nov 2025
Landscape Consultee Response
27 Nov 2025
Objection
6 Nov 2025
SBD Consultee Comments
21 Oct 2025
Decision Notice
21 May 2026
Officer Report
18 May 2026
Arb Report
13 Jan 2026
Show all 10 rows
Arboricultural Consultee Response Email
5 Dec 2025
Ecologist Consultee Response Email
28 Nov 2025
Landscape Consultee Response
27 Nov 2025
Drainage-Infrastructure Consultee Response
27 Nov 2025
Landscape Consultee Response
27 Nov 2025
Objection
6 Nov 2025
SBD Consultee Comments
21 Oct 2025

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 21 May 2026, delegated decision by Helen Harris — 37 weeks from submission (29 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Sep 2025
Application received
14 Oct 2025
Application validated
13 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
21 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Helen Harris
1 Sep 2025
Application received
14 Oct 2025
Application validated
13 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
21 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Helen Harris

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposal, by reason of the lack of family sized homes with three or more bedrooms and its preponderance of smaller 1-bed units, would fail to achieve an appropriate housing mix, having regard to the location of the site and its surroundings as well as the evidence of local need which identifies the need for more larger, family-sized units and would fail to contribute to the creation of inclusive and mixed communities, contrary to the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies H1, H2 and H10 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies HO1 and HO2 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
1
- The proposal, by reason of the lack of family sized homes with three or more bedrooms and its preponderance of smaller 1-bed units, would fail to achieve an appropriate housing mix, having regard to the location of the site and its surroundings as well as the evidence of local need which identifies the need for more larger, family-sized units and would fail to contribute to the creation of inclusive and mixed communities, contrary to the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies H1, H2 and H10 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies HO1 and HO2 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
Policies cited
H1H2H10HO1HO2NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.