Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowStanmore wardPL/2362/25
Planning application · Harrow

PL/2362/25.

26 Stanmore Hill, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 3BJ

Householder at 26 Stanmore Hill, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 3BJ, received 11 Sep 2025 — refused on 14 Apr 2026 (delegated, James Clark).

HarrowStanmoreHA7 3BJPL/2362/25
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Apr 2026
31 wks
Decision time
23 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Alterations to brick front boundary wall

Reference
PL/2362/25
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA7 3BJ
Council
Received
11 Sep 2025
Validated
12 Sep 2025
Target date
14 Apr 2026
Decision date
14 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
PL/2362/25
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA7 3BJ
Council
Received
11 Sep 2025
Validated
12 Sep 2025
Target date
14 Apr 2026
Decision date
14 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
14 Apr 2026
Officer Report
10 Apr 2026
Planning and Heritage Statement
12 Sept 2025
Proposed Floor Plans & Elevation(s)
11 Sept 2025
Existing Floor Plan and Elevations
11 Sept 2025
Design & Access Statement
11 Sept 2025
Planning statement
11 Sept 2025
location plan
11 Sept 2025
Application Form Redacted
11 Sept 2025
Decision Notice
14 Apr 2026
Officer Report
10 Apr 2026
Planning and Heritage Statement
12 Sept 2025
Show all 9 rows
Proposed Floor Plans & Elevation(s)
11 Sept 2025
Existing Floor Plan and Elevations
11 Sept 2025
Design & Access Statement
11 Sept 2025
Planning statement
11 Sept 2025
location plan
11 Sept 2025
Application Form Redacted
11 Sept 2025

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 14 Apr 2026, delegated decision by James Clark — 31 weeks from submission (23 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Sep 2025
Application received
12 Sep 2025
Application validated
14 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
14 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark
11 Sep 2025
Application received
12 Sep 2025
Application validated
14 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed boundary treatment by reason its excessive height, extended width along the boundary and the lack of robust soft landscaping entwined within the wall, is considered to have a harmful impact on the character and setting of the Stanmore Hill Conservation Area. As such, the development fails to accord with aspirations of Section 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, Policy HC1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy HE1 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041) Plan and guidance in the Stanmore Hill Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Strategy.
1
- The proposed boundary treatment by reason its excessive height, extended width along the boundary and the lack of robust soft landscaping entwined within the wall, is considered to have a harmful impact on the character and setting of the Stanmore Hill Conservation Area. As such, the development fails to accord with aspirations of Section 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, Policy HC1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy HE1 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041) Plan and guidance in the Stanmore Hill Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Strategy.
Policies cited
HC1HE1

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.