Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey side to rear extension with attached garage; alterations and extension to roof to form end gable; rear dormer; two rooflights in front roof slope; window in end gable; external alterations (Demolition of attached garage)
Refused on 22 Nov 2024, delegated decision by Deniss Nikandrovs — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
4 Sep 2024
Application received
27 Sep 2024
Application validated
22 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
22 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Deniss Nikandrovs
4 Sep 2024
Application received
27 Sep 2024
Application validated
22 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
22 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Deniss Nikandrovs
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its depth, design and scale would result in an
overly dominant and bulky form of development, at odds with the prevailing visual character in the immediate
location. As such, the development is contrary Policy D3 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1.B of the
Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan
(2013) and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
2
- The proposed side and rear single storey extension by reason of its depth and proximity to the shared
boundaries would result in detrimental overbearing and loss of outlook to rear habitable windows located on
No 10 and No 14 The Avenue. As such, the development is contrary to Policy D3 of The London Plan (2021),
Core Policy CS1.B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management
Policies Local Plan (2013) and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide
(2010).
3
- The proposed development is supported by inadequate and unsatisfactory compensatory flood storage to
mitigate flood risk and has no connectivity with the flood plain and inadequate drainage drawing showing
surface and foul water connections and their outfall details. As such, the development is contrary to the
National Planning Policy Framework (2023), policies SI12 and SI13 of The London Plan (2021) and policies
DM9 and DM10 of the Harrow Development Management Polices Local Plan (2013).
1
- The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its depth, design and scale would result in an
overly dominant and bulky form of development, at odds with the prevailing visual character in the immediate
location. As such, the development is contrary Policy D3 of The London Plan (2021), Core Policy CS1.B of the
Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan
(2013) and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).
2
- The proposed side and rear single storey extension by reason of its depth and proximity to the shared
boundaries would result in detrimental overbearing and loss of outlook to rear habitable windows located on
No 10 and No 14 The Avenue. As such, the development is contrary to Policy D3 of The London Plan (2021),
Core Policy CS1.B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management
Policies Local Plan (2013) and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide
(2010).
3
- The proposed development is supported by inadequate and unsatisfactory compensatory flood storage to
mitigate flood risk and has no connectivity with the flood plain and inadequate drainage drawing showing
surface and foul water connections and their outfall details. As such, the development is contrary to the
National Planning Policy Framework (2023), policies SI12 and SI13 of The London Plan (2021) and policies
DM9 and DM10 of the Harrow Development Management Polices Local Plan (2013).
Policies cited
D3DM1SI12SI13DM9DM10NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.