Planning application · Harrow
PL/2642/24.
30 Kenton Lane, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 8TX
Householder at 30 Kenton Lane, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 8TX, received 25 Sep 2024 — refused on 20 Jan 2025 (delegated, Kanchan Sharma).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Jan 2025
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Detached single storey outbuilding for use as Gym/Storage/Workshop
Reference
PL/2642/24
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 8TX
Ward
Council
Received
25 Sep 2024
Validated
26 Nov 2024
Target date
21 Jan 2025
Decision date
20 Jan 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
PL/2642/24
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 8TX
Ward
Council
Received
25 Sep 2024
Validated
26 Nov 2024
Target date
21 Jan 2025
Decision date
20 Jan 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 20 Jan 2025, delegated decision by Kanchan Sharma — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
25 Sep 2024
Application received
26 Nov 2024
Application validated
21 Jan 2025
Statutory target date
20 Jan 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kanchan Sharma
25 Sep 2024
Application received
26 Nov 2024
Application validated
21 Jan 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 Jan 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kanchan Sharma
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed outbuilding by reason of its excessive depth and height would be unduly bulky,
disproportionate, incongruous and out of character with the prevailing pattern of development in the area,
causing visual harm to the character and appearance of the immediate area contrary to the high quality
design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 D.1, D.7 and D.11 of The
London Plan (2021), Core policy CS1B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow
Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013), and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document:
Residential Design Guide (2010).
2
-The proposed outbuilding by reason of its excessive mass and bulk would be a visually obtrusive form of
development causing an unacceptable degree of overbearing and loss of outlook concerns when viewed from
the neighbouring occupiers Nos 28 and 32 Kenton Lane, contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the
National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 D.1, D.7 and D.11 of The London Plan (2021), Core
policy CS1B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management
Policies Local Plan (2013), and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide
(2010).
1
- The proposed outbuilding by reason of its excessive depth and height would be unduly bulky,
disproportionate, incongruous and out of character with the prevailing pattern of development in the area,
causing visual harm to the character and appearance of the immediate area contrary to the high quality
design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 D.1, D.7 and D.11 of The
London Plan (2021), Core policy CS1B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow
Development Management Policies Local Plan (2013), and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document:
Residential Design Guide (2010).
2
-The proposed outbuilding by reason of its excessive mass and bulk would be a visually obtrusive form of
development causing an unacceptable degree of overbearing and loss of outlook concerns when viewed from
the neighbouring occupiers Nos 28 and 32 Kenton Lane, contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the
National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 D.1, D.7 and D.11 of The London Plan (2021), Core
policy CS1B of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management
Policies Local Plan (2013), and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide
(2010).
Policies cited
London Plan 11CS1BDM1NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.