Planning application · Harrow
PL/3142/25.
103A Uxbridge Road, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 6DN
Full / Other Planning at 103A Uxbridge Road, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 6DN, received 4 Dec 2025 — refused on 20 Apr 2026 (delegated, Ian Opolot).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Apr 2026
20 wks
Decision time
12 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Conversion of first floor into two flats (1 x 1 bed and 1 x studio) (Retrospective)
Reference
PL/3142/25
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 6DN
Ward
Council
Received
4 Dec 2025
Validated
23 Feb 2026
Target date
20 Apr 2026
Decision date
20 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Reference
PL/3142/25
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA3 6DN
Ward
Council
Received
4 Dec 2025
Validated
23 Feb 2026
Target date
20 Apr 2026
Decision date
20 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 20 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Ian Opolot — 20 weeks from submission (12 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
4 Dec 2025
Application received
23 Feb 2026
Application validated
20 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
20 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Ian Opolot
4 Dec 2025
Application received
23 Feb 2026
Application validated
20 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Ian Opolot
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
-The proposal, by reason of its subdivision from a 1x2 bed flat, to a 1x1 bed flat and a studio flat, would fail
to achieve an appropriate housing mix, having regard to the location of the site and its surroundings and
would fail to respond to local need and contribute to the creation of inclusive and mixed communities, contrary
to the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), policy H10 of the London Plan (2021)
and policies HO1 and HO2 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
2
-The proposed studio flat, by reason of its inadequate Gross Internal Area and poor horizontal stacking
relationship with the kitchen of the adjacent flat, would fail to meet the minimum standards set out in National
Technical Housing Standards and would give rise to unreasonable noise and disturbance to the current and
future occupiers of the unit. The proposal therefore provides poor quality and cramped
accommodation, detrimental to the amenities of current and future occupiers, contrary to the provisions of the
National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policy HO2 of the
Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
1
-The proposal, by reason of its subdivision from a 1x2 bed flat, to a 1x1 bed flat and a studio flat, would fail
to achieve an appropriate housing mix, having regard to the location of the site and its surroundings and
would fail to respond to local need and contribute to the creation of inclusive and mixed communities, contrary
to the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), policy H10 of the London Plan (2021)
and policies HO1 and HO2 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
2
-The proposed studio flat, by reason of its inadequate Gross Internal Area and poor horizontal stacking
relationship with the kitchen of the adjacent flat, would fail to meet the minimum standards set out in National
Technical Housing Standards and would give rise to unreasonable noise and disturbance to the current and
future occupiers of the unit. The proposal therefore provides poor quality and cramped
accommodation, detrimental to the amenities of current and future occupiers, contrary to the provisions of the
National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policy HO2 of the
Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).
Policies cited
H10HO1HO2NPPFD6
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.