Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowHatch End wardWEST/308/00/FUL
Planning application · Harrow

WEST/308/00/FUL.

RANMOOR Royston Grove, Hatch End, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 4HD

Full / Other Planning at RANMOOR Royston Grove, Hatch End, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 4HD, received 11 Apr 2000 — approved on 9 Jun 2000 (delegated, TW Mr T Wood).

HarrowHatch EndHA5 4HDWEST/308/00/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Approved
Outcome
9 Jun 2000
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

USE OF GARAGE AS PLAYROOM AND ALTERATIONS TO FRONT ELEVATION

Reference
WEST/308/00/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA5 4HD
Council
Received
11 Apr 2000
Validated
12 Apr 2000
Target date
6 Jun 2000
Decision date
9 Jun 2000
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
WEST/308/00/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA5 4HD
Council
Received
11 Apr 2000
Validated
12 Apr 2000
Target date
6 Jun 2000
Decision date
9 Jun 2000
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 9 Jun 2000, delegated decision by TW Mr T Wood — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Apr 2000
Application received
12 Apr 2000
Application validated
6 Jun 2000
Statutory target date
9 Jun 2000
Delegated decision: Approved · TW Mr T Wood
11 Apr 2000
Application received
12 Apr 2000
Application validated
6 Jun 2000
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
9 Jun 2000
Delegated decision: Approved · TW Mr T Wood

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.