Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowHarrow on the Hill wardHA2 0JNWEST/805/98/FUL
Planning application · Harrow

WEST/805/98/FUL.

CHRIST CHURCH Roxeth Hill, Harrow On The Hill, Harrow, HA2 0JN

Full / Other Planning at CHRIST CHURCH Roxeth Hill, Harrow On The Hill, Harrow, HA2 0JN, received 25 Nov 1998 — approved on 23 Mar 1999 (delegated, PI Mr P Iliffe).

HarrowHarrow on the HillHA2 0JNWEST/805/98/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Approved
Outcome
23 Mar 1999
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

PROVISION OF REPLACEMENT TIMBER BELFRY

Reference
WEST/805/98/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
25 Nov 1998
Validated
23 Mar 1999
Target date
20 Jan 1999
Decision date
23 Mar 1999
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
WEST/805/98/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
25 Nov 1998
Validated
23 Mar 1999
Target date
20 Jan 1999
Decision date
23 Mar 1999
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 23 Mar 1999, delegated decision by PI Mr P Iliffe — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Nov 1998
Application received
23 Mar 1999
Application validated
20 Jan 1999
Statutory target date
23 Mar 1999
Delegated decision: Approved · PI Mr P Iliffe
25 Nov 1998
Application received
23 Mar 1999
Application validated
20 Jan 1999
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
23 Mar 1999
Delegated decision: Approved · PI Mr P Iliffe

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.