Planning Atlas
AtlasHarrowOfficersPb Peter Barron
Case officer · Harrow Planning

PB Peter Barron.

Last recorded decision Sep 2016 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Harrow with an approval rate of 62% across 13 decided planning applications, spanning 7 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer13 decisions62% approval
Wards shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
Showing
All years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
13
Applications
2013–16
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 79%100%201467%201550%2016
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate62% · 213th of 263
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of PB Peter Barron's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most across their decisions — how often each appears, and whether refusals citing it survive appeal.

In development — policy citations are coded from officer reports, and that parsing hasn't run for Harrow yet. Nothing is shown until it is real.

Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
3
33%
2
100%
Show all 7 rows

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2013–16.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
P/2775/16
Householder
Refused
2016-09-22
P/3177/16
Full Planning Application
Refused
2016-09-12
P/2775/16
Householder
Refused
2016-09-22
P/3177/16
Full Planning Application
Refused
2016-09-12
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 13 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners
2. RMCJ Design
3. MAC Architect
4. Preston Bennett Planning
At a glance
OfficerPB Peter Barron
BoroughHarrow
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications13 (2013–16)
Approval rate62%
London approval avg79%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Harrow planning register and published decision notices, 2013–16. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Harrow decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.