Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHillingdonPINKWELL ward16389/APP/2020/3349
Planning application · Hillingdon

16389/APP/2020/3349.

53 PINKWELL AVENUE HAYES

Full / Other Planning at 53 PINKWELL AVENUE HAYES, received 17 Oct 2020 — refused on 26 Jan 2021 (delegated, Nicola Taplin).

HillingdonPINKWELL16389/APP/2020/3349
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHillingdon profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Jan 2021
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
1
Conditions
attached to the decision
7
Documents
7 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hillingdon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Use of garage for business purposes (premises to run tiffin services) (Application for a Certificate of Lawful Development for an Existing Development)

Reference
16389/APP/2020/3349
Type
Planning Application
Applicant
Not recorded
Case officer
Council
Received
17 Oct 2020
Validated
7 Dec 2020
Target date
1 Feb 2021
Decision date
26 Jan 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal
Reference
16389/APP/2020/3349
Type
Planning Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Case officer
Council
Received
17 Oct 2020
Validated
7 Dec 2020
Target date
1 Feb 2021
Decision date
26 Jan 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
APPLICATION FORM AMENDED
LOCATION PLAN
PROPOSED PLAN
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
DECISION NOTICE
OFFICER REPORT
APPLICATION FORM AMENDED
LOCATION PLAN
PROPOSED PLAN
Show all 7 rows
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
DECISION NOTICE
OFFICER REPORT

Documents open on the Hillingdon portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Jan 2021, delegated decision by Nicola Taplin — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
17 Oct 2020
Application received
7 Dec 2020
Application validated
1 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
26 Jan 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Nicola Taplin
17 Oct 2020
Application received
7 Dec 2020
Application validated
1 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Jan 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Nicola Taplin

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Reason for Refusal 1 . The existing development does not constitute Lawful Development under Section 191 of Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 10 of the Planning and Compensation Act 1991 as the Applicant has not demonstrated that, on the balance of probability, the use has existed and been continuous for at least a period of ten years, prior to the date of this application. This determination is based on your submitted plans. All measurements are taken from existing ground level.
1
Reason for Refusal 1 . The existing development does not constitute Lawful Development under Section 191 of Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 10 of the Planning and Compensation Act 1991 as the Applicant has not demonstrated that, on the balance of probability, the use has existed and been continuous for at least a period of ten years, prior to the date of this application. This determination is based on your submitted plans. All measurements are taken from existing ground level.

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.