Planning application · Hillingdon
29159/APP/2023/3277.
Full / Other Planning at 92 TUDOR ROAD HAYES, received 10 Nov 2023 — approved on 2 Feb 2024 (delegated, Samuel Patten).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHillingdon profile →
Approved
Outcome
2 Feb 2024
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
8
Conditions
attached to the decision
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hillingdon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a first floor extension to the rear
Reference
29159/APP/2023/3277
Type
Planning Application
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
10 Nov 2023
Validated
16 Nov 2023
Target date
2 Feb 2024
Decision date
2 Feb 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Approval
Premises record
Council register
Reference
29159/APP/2023/3277
Type
Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
10 Nov 2023
Validated
16 Nov 2023
Target date
2 Feb 2024
Decision date
2 Feb 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Approval
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Documents open on the Hillingdon portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 2 Feb 2024, delegated decision by Samuel Patten — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
10 Nov 2023
Application received
16 Nov 2023
Application validated
2 Feb 2024
Statutory target date
2 Feb 2024
Delegated decision: Approved · Samuel Patten
10 Nov 2023
Application received
16 Nov 2023
Application validated
2 Feb 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
2 Feb 2024
Delegated decision: Approved · Samuel Patten
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.