Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHillingdonICKENHAM ward31341/A/98/0806
Planning application · Hillingdon

31341/A/98/0806.

55 HOYLAKE CRESCENT ICKENHAM

Other at 55 HOYLAKE CRESCENT ICKENHAM, received 28 Apr 2098 — approved on 20 Nov 2098 (delegated, Richard Phillips).

HillingdonICKENHAM31341/A/98/0806
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHillingdon profile →
Approved
Outcome
20 Nov 2098
29 wks
Decision time
21 wks over the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hillingdon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey pitched roof rear extension

Reference
31341/A/98/0806
Type
Other
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
28 Apr 2098
Target date
23 Jun 2098
Decision date
20 Nov 2098
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Approval
Reference
31341/A/98/0806
Type
Other
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
28 Apr 2098
Target date
23 Jun 2098
Decision date
20 Nov 2098
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Approval
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Hillingdon portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 20 Nov 2098, delegated decision by Richard Phillips — 29 weeks from submission (21 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Apr 2098
Application received
23 Jun 2098
Statutory target date
20 Nov 2098
Delegated decision: Approved · Richard Phillips
28 Apr 2098
Application received
23 Jun 2098
Statutory target date
20 Nov 2098
Delegated decision: Approved · Richard Phillips

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.