Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHillingdonEASTCOTE 2022 ward35503/APP/2024/686
Planning application · Hillingdon

35503/APP/2024/686.

214 FIELD END ROAD EASTCOTE PINNER

Full / Other Planning at 214 FIELD END ROAD EASTCOTE PINNER, received 15 Mar 2024 — refused on 10 May 2024 (delegated, Emilie Bateman).

HillingdonEASTCOTE 202235503/APP/2024/686
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHillingdon profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 May 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
5
Documents
5 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hillingdon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of opening hours of restaurant/takeaway to 11.30am to 00.30am on Sunday to Thursday and 11.30am to 02.00am on Friday and Saturday (Application for a Certificate of Lawfulness for an Existing Use or Operation or Activity).

Reference
35503/APP/2024/686
Type
Planning Application
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
15 Mar 2024
Target date
10 May 2024
Decision date
10 May 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal
Reference
35503/APP/2024/686
Type
Planning Application
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
15 Mar 2024
Target date
10 May 2024
Decision date
10 May 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
APPLICATION FORM
LOCATION PLAN
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
DECISION NOTICE
OFFICERS REPORTS
APPLICATION FORM
LOCATION PLAN
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Show all 5 rows
DECISION NOTICE
OFFICERS REPORTS

Documents open on the Hillingdon portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 10 May 2024, delegated decision by Emilie Bateman — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Mar 2024
Application received
10 May 2024
Statutory target date
10 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Emilie Bateman
15 Mar 2024
Application received
10 May 2024
Statutory target date
10 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Emilie Bateman

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The evidence that has been provided in support of the applicant's case fails to demonstrate that, on the balance of probabilities, there has been a continuous breach of Conditions 4 (operating hours) and 5 (Preparation and sale of food) attached to planning permission 35503/D/98/1474 for a continuous period of at least ten years before 15th March 2024 (the date of the application). The use of the premises between the 11.00am to 12.30am Sundays to Thursdays and 11.00am to 02.00am on Fridays and Saturdays is therefore unlawful. This determination is based on your submitted plans. All measurements are taken from existing ground level.
1
The evidence that has been provided in support of the applicant's case fails to demonstrate that, on the balance of probabilities, there has been a continuous breach of Conditions 4 (operating hours) and 5 (Preparation and sale of food) attached to planning permission 35503/D/98/1474 for a continuous period of at least ten years before 15th March 2024 (the date of the application). The use of the premises between the 11.00am to 12.30am Sundays to Thursdays and 11.00am to 02.00am on Fridays and Saturdays is therefore unlawful. This determination is based on your submitted plans. All measurements are taken from existing ground level.

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.