Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHillingdonUXBRIDGE NORTH wardREAR OF 295 LONG LANE & 2-6 TUDOR WAY HILLINGDON53596/98/2447
Planning application · Hillingdon

53596/98/2447.

REAR OF 295 LONG LANE & 2-6 TUDOR WAY HILLINGDON

Other at REAR OF 295 LONG LANE & 2-6 TUDOR WAY HILLINGDON, received 22 Dec 2098 — refused on 9 Apr 2099 (delegated, Jim Read).

HillingdonUXBRIDGE NORTH53596/98/2447
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHillingdon profile →
Refused
Outcome
9 Apr 2099
15 wks
Decision time
7 wks over the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hillingdon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of 2 blocks of chalet-style flatted development comprising of 6 two-bedroom flats per block, with access from Auriol Drive (outline application)

Reference
53596/98/2447
Type
Other
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
22 Dec 2098
Target date
16 Feb 2099
Decision date
9 Apr 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal
Reference
53596/98/2447
Type
Other
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
22 Dec 2098
Target date
16 Feb 2099
Decision date
9 Apr 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Hillingdon portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 9 Apr 2099, delegated decision by Jim Read — 15 weeks from submission (7 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Dec 2098
Application received
16 Feb 2099
Statutory target date
9 Apr 2099
Delegated decision: Refused · Jim Read
22 Dec 2098
Application received
16 Feb 2099
Statutory target date
9 Apr 2099
Delegated decision: Refused · Jim Read

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.