Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHillingdonCHARVILLE ward57243/APP/2021/1716
Planning application · Hillingdon

57243/APP/2021/1716.

289 LANSBURY DRIVE HAYES

Full / Other Planning at 289 LANSBURY DRIVE HAYES, received 30 Apr 2021 — refused on 11 Jun 2021 (delegated, Zara Raza).

HillingdonCHARVILLE57243/APP/2021/1716
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHillingdon profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Jun 2021
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
1
Conditions
attached to the decision
10
Documents
10 linked
1
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hillingdon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey rear extension, which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 4 metres, for which the maximum height would be 3.5metres, and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.85 metres

Reference
57243/APP/2021/1716
Type
Planning Application
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
30 Apr 2021
Target date
10 Jun 2021
Decision date
11 Jun 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal
Reference
57243/APP/2021/1716
Type
Planning Application
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
30 Apr 2021
Target date
10 Jun 2021
Decision date
11 Jun 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
APPLICATION FORM
LOCATION PLAN
LOCATION PLAN
EXISTING PLAN
EXISTING PLAN
PROPOSED PLAN
PROPOSED PLAN
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
DECISION NOTICE
OFFICERS REPORTS
APPLICATION FORM
LOCATION PLAN
LOCATION PLAN
Show all 10 rows
EXISTING PLAN
EXISTING PLAN
PROPOSED PLAN
PROPOSED PLAN
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
DECISION NOTICE
OFFICERS REPORTS

Documents open on the Hillingdon portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 11 Jun 2021, delegated decision by Zara Raza — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Apr 2021
Application received
10 Jun 2021
Statutory target date
11 Jun 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Zara Raza
30 Apr 2021
Application received
10 Jun 2021
Statutory target date
11 Jun 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Zara Raza

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Reason for Refusal: The proposed development does not constitute permitted development by virtue of the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, as the proposed development would unduly detract from the amenities of the adjoining occupiers at 291 Lansbury Drive, by reason of visual intrusion, overdominance, overshadowing, loss of daylight, loss of sunlight and loss of outlook.
1
Reason for Refusal: The proposed development does not constitute permitted development by virtue of the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, as the proposed development would unduly detract from the amenities of the adjoining occupiers at 291 Lansbury Drive, by reason of visual intrusion, overdominance, overshadowing, loss of daylight, loss of sunlight and loss of outlook.

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
Objections
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.