Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHillingdonHAREFIELD ward8393/APP/2021/2191
Planning application · Hillingdon

8393/APP/2021/2191.

WIDEWATER PLACE, NORGINE HOUSE MOORHALL ROAD HAREFIELD

Full / Other Planning at WIDEWATER PLACE, NORGINE HOUSE MOORHALL ROAD HAREFIELD, received 1 Jun 2021 — refused on 26 Jul 2021 (delegated, Nesha Burnham).

HillingdonHAREFIELD8393/APP/2021/2191
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHillingdon profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Jul 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
1
Conditions
attached to the decision
15
Documents
15 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hillingdon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use from Offices to 49 residential flats (Use Class C3) (Application for Prior Approval under Schedule 2, Part 3, Class O of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended))

Reference
8393/APP/2021/2191
Type
Planning Application
Applicant
Not recorded
Case officer
Council
Received
1 Jun 2021
Target date
26 Jul 2021
Decision date
26 Jul 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal (Appealed)
Reference
8393/APP/2021/2191
Type
Planning Application
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Case officer
Council
Received
1 Jun 2021
Target date
26 Jul 2021
Decision date
26 Jul 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refusal (Appealed)
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
APPLICATION FORM
LOCATION PLAN
SITE LAYOUT - PROPOSED
NOISE ASSESSMENT
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
PROPOSED PLAN
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
LAND ASSESSMENT
LAND ASSESSMENT
APPLICATION FORM
LOCATION PLAN
SITE LAYOUT - PROPOSED
Show all 10 rows
NOISE ASSESSMENT
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
PROPOSED PLAN
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
LAND ASSESSMENT
LAND ASSESSMENT

Documents open on the Hillingdon portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Jul 2021, delegated decision by Nesha Burnham — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Jun 2021
Application received
26 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
26 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Nesha Burnham
1 Jun 2021
Application received
26 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
26 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Nesha Burnham

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Reasons for Refusal: The proposed development does not constitute permitted development by virtue of the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 3, Class O of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) because insufficient evidence has been provided in relation to the impact of noise from adjacent commercial premises on the intended occupiers of the proposed dwellings. Paragraph W(3)(d) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) states that the local planning authority may refuse an application where, in the opinion of the authority the developer has provided insufficient information to enable the authority to establish whether the proposed development complies with, any conditions, limitations or restrictions specified in this Part of being applicable to the development in question. As such, the prior approval application is refused.
1
Reasons for Refusal: The proposed development does not constitute permitted development by virtue of the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 3, Class O of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) because insufficient evidence has been provided in relation to the impact of noise from adjacent commercial premises on the intended occupiers of the proposed dwellings. Paragraph W(3)(d) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) states that the local planning authority may refuse an application where, in the opinion of the authority the developer has provided insufficient information to enable the authority to establish whether the proposed development complies with, any conditions, limitations or restrictions specified in this Part of being applicable to the development in question. As such, the prior approval application is refused.

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.