Planning Atlas
AtlasHillingdonOfficersJonathan Cutler
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Jonathan Cutler.

Last recorded decision Mar 2002 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 78% across 86 decided planning applications, spanning 10 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer86 decisions78% approval
Wards shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
Showing
All years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
86
Applications
1999–02
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 79%71%200181%2002
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate78% · 131st of 271
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Jonathan Cutler's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most across their decisions — how often each appears, and whether refusals citing it survive appeal.

In development — policy citations are coded from officer reports, and that parsing hasn't run for Hillingdon yet. Nothing is shown until it is real.

Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
Show all 10 rows
7
71%
5
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 1999–02.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
9241/APP/2001/2030
Planning Application
Refused
2002-10-04
20634/APP/2001/2184
Planning Application
Refused
2002-07-10
9241/APP/2001/2030
Planning Application
Refused
2002-10-04
20634/APP/2001/2184
Planning Application
Refused
2002-07-10
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 86 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. TOWN PLANNING CONSULTANCY LTD. PARK HOUSE GREYFRIARS ROAD CARDIFF CF10
2. BUILDING DESIGN (U K) LTD. TAYSON HOUSE METHLEY ROAD CASTLEFORD WEST YORKSHIRE WF11
3. Eley & Associates
4. MR & MRS I CAWKWELL
At a glance
OfficerJonathan Cutler
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications86 (1999–02)
Approval rate78%
London approval avg79%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 1999–02. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.