Ward · London Borough of Hillingdon
YEADING.
YEADING sees an approval rate of 68% — 11 points below the Hillingdon average across 538 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 31.5%.[1]
Hillingdon538 applications
Postcodes (centres) shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
538
Applications 2001–25
Decided applications
68%
Approval rate
11pp below borough avg (79%)
31.5%
Refusal rate
2nd highest of 45
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Hillingdon planning records and committee minutes, 2001–25.
Ward overview
YEADING recorded 538 substantive planning decisions over 2001–25, approving 68% of them — 11 percentage points below the Hillingdon borough average of 79%. Its refusal rate of 31.5% is 2nd highest of 45.
Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.
Who decides here
At a glance[1]
WardYEADING
CouncilHillingdon
Applications538 (2001–25)
Approval rate68%
Refusal rate31.5%
Decision time8.7 wks avg
Ward members2 (both Labour)
Planning constraints[2]
Conservation areas2
Article 4 directions2
Listed buildings17
TPO trees43
Flood zoneZone 1 (low)
Sources & method
- [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2001–25. · methodology
- [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
- [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
- [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.