Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Islington›…Barnsbury wardN1 9EN›P2014/0672/FUL
Planning application · Islington

P2014/0672/FUL.

32 Chapel Market, London, N1 9EN

Full / Other Planning at 32 Chapel Market, London, N1 9EN, received 14 Feb 2014 — approved on 1 May 2014 (delegated, Nathaniel Baker).

Islington›Barnsbury›N1 9EN›P2014/0672/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationIslington profile →
Approved
Outcome
1 May 2014
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Islington planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of replacement shopfront. (Advertisement Consent application Ref:

Reference
P2014/0672/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
14 Feb 2014
Validated
11 Mar 2014
Target date
1 May 2014
Decision date
1 May 2014
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Reference
P2014/0672/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
14 Feb 2014
Validated
11 Mar 2014
Target date
1 May 2014
Decision date
1 May 2014
Decision route
Not recorded
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Islington portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 1 May 2014, delegated decision by Nathaniel Baker — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Feb 2014
Application received
11 Mar 2014
Application validated
1 May 2014
Statutory target date
1 May 2014
Delegated decision: Approved · Nathaniel Baker
14 Feb 2014
Application received
11 Mar 2014
Application validated
1 May 2014
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
1 May 2014
Delegated decision: Approved · Nathaniel Baker

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.