Planning application · Islington
P2024/3460/FUL.
67 Cloudesley Road, London, N1 0EL
Householder at 67 Cloudesley Road, London, N1 0EL, received 20 Nov 2024 — refused on 4 Feb 2025 (delegated, Guy Fanning).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationIslington profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Feb 2025
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Islington planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Installation of a shelf atop existing lightwell to create bin store enclosure and changes to front boundary treatment to provide gate access to bin store.
Reference
P2024/3460/FUL
Type
Full Planning (Householder)
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N1 0EL
Ward
Council
Received
20 Nov 2024
Validated
29 Nov 2024
Target date
22 Jan 2025
Decision date
4 Feb 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Council register
Reference
P2024/3460/FUL
Type
Full Planning (Householder)
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N1 0EL
Ward
Council
Received
20 Nov 2024
Validated
29 Nov 2024
Target date
22 Jan 2025
Decision date
4 Feb 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Islington portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 4 Feb 2025, delegated decision by Guy Fanning — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
20 Nov 2024
Application received
29 Nov 2024
Application validated
22 Jan 2025
Statutory target date
4 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Guy Fanning
20 Nov 2024
Application received
29 Nov 2024
Application validated
22 Jan 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Guy Fanning
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
REASON: The proposed works by virtue of their loss of historic fabric and unsympathetic design would
adversely affect the character and special architectural and historic interest of the listed building and
the character and appearance of the Barnsbury Conservation Area. The works would therefore cause
less than substantial harm to the significance of the heritage assets with no public benefit which
outweighs this harm. The proposed development is therefore contrary to paragraph 215 of Chapter 16
(conserving and enhancing the historic environment) of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024);
policies D4 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021), policies PLAN1, DH1 and DH2 of Islington's Strategic
and Development Management Policies (2023) and the guidance contained within Islington’s
Barnsbury Conservation Area Design Guidelines (2002) and Islington’s Urban Design Guide (2017).
Certified that this document contains a true record of a decision of the Council.
1
REASON: The proposed works by virtue of their loss of historic fabric and unsympathetic design would
adversely affect the character and special architectural and historic interest of the listed building and
the character and appearance of the Barnsbury Conservation Area. The works would therefore cause
less than substantial harm to the significance of the heritage assets with no public benefit which
outweighs this harm. The proposed development is therefore contrary to paragraph 215 of Chapter 16
(conserving and enhancing the historic environment) of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024);
policies D4 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021), policies PLAN1, DH1 and DH2 of Islington's Strategic
and Development Management Policies (2023) and the guidance contained within Islington’s
Barnsbury Conservation Area Design Guidelines (2002) and Islington’s Urban Design Guide (2017).
Certified that this document contains a true record of a decision of the Council.
Policies cited
D4HC1PLAN1DH1DH2NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.