Planning application · Islington
P2025/3510/FUL.
Pavement opposite 142 Old Street London, EC1V 9BS
Full / Other Planning at Pavement opposite 142 Old Street London, EC1V 9BS, received 11 Dec 2025 — refused on 11 Feb 2026 (delegated, Eve Mackintosh).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationIslington profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Feb 2026
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
20
Documents
20 linked
1
Objections
not captured
Yes
Appeal
Written Representations
Record from the Islington planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Proposed installation of 1no. new BT Street Hub incorporating 75' LCD advert screens plus the removal of associated call box.
Reference
P2025/3510/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EC1V 9BS
Ward
Council
Received
11 Dec 2025
Validated
2 Jan 2026
Target date
15 Feb 2026
Decision date
11 Feb 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
APPEAL LODGED
Council register
Reference
P2025/3510/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EC1V 9BS
Ward
Council
Received
11 Dec 2025
Validated
2 Jan 2026
Target date
15 Feb 2026
Decision date
11 Feb 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
APPEAL LODGED
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Islington portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 11 Feb 2026, delegated decision by Eve Mackintosh — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
11 Dec 2025
Application received
2 Jan 2026
Application validated
15 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
11 Feb 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Eve Mackintosh
Appeal
Written Representations
11 Dec 2025
Application received
2 Jan 2026
Application validated
15 Feb 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
11 Feb 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Eve Mackintosh
Appeal
Written Representations
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
REASON: The proposed communications hub and its associated advertisement displays by reason of
its design, scale, height, siting and prominent location would increase visual clutter and would have a
harmful impact on the character and appearance of the area and the streetscene. The proposal would
therefore be contrary to policies D3, D4 and T2 of the London Plan (2021), policies PLAN1, DH6, ST3
and T4 of Islington’s Strategic and Development Management Policies (2023) and the guidance
contained within Islington's Urban Design Guide (2017).
Certified that this document contains a true record of a decision of the Council
1
REASON: The proposed communications hub and its associated advertisement displays by reason of
its design, scale, height, siting and prominent location would increase visual clutter and would have a
harmful impact on the character and appearance of the area and the streetscene. The proposal would
therefore be contrary to policies D3, D4 and T2 of the London Plan (2021), policies PLAN1, DH6, ST3
and T4 of Islington’s Strategic and Development Management Policies (2023) and the guidance
contained within Islington's Urban Design Guide (2017).
Certified that this document contains a true record of a decision of the Council
Policies cited
D3D4T2PLAN1DH6ST3T4
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Written Representations
Outcome not yet recorded
Written Representations
Outcome not yet recorded
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
Objections
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.