Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames
20/01493/FUL.
61 Malden Way New Malden KT3 6DX
Full / Other Planning at 61 Malden Way New Malden KT3 6DX, received 30 Jun 2020 — refused on 14 Jun 2021 (delegated, Jonathan Ashworth).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Jun 2021
50 wks
Decision time
42 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Conversion of single family dwelling into 3 self-contained flats (2x 3 bedroom and 1x 1 bedroom). Extension of existing side dormer window, with installation of 2no side rooflights. Addition of 3 parking spaces at the rear of site.
Reference
20/01493/FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
KT3 6DX
Ward
Council
Received
30 Jun 2020
Validated
7 Sep 2020
Target date
2 Nov 2020
Decision date
14 Jun 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
20/01493/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
KT3 6DX
Ward
Council
Received
30 Jun 2020
Validated
7 Sep 2020
Target date
2 Nov 2020
Decision date
14 Jun 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 14 Jun 2021, delegated decision by Jonathan Ashworth — 50 weeks from submission (42 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
30 Jun 2020
Application received
7 Sep 2020
Application validated
2 Nov 2020
Statutory target date
14 Jun 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Jonathan Ashworth
30 Jun 2020
Application received
7 Sep 2020
Application validated
2 Nov 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Jun 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Jonathan Ashworth
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development would fail to provide an appropriate amount of living space in relation to the
size of the properties. This would lead to a cramped form of development that would be detrimental to the
residential amenity of future residents, contrary to policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and policy DM13 of
the Core Strategy (2012).
2
The proposed development would fail to provide an adequate amount of garden space for residents to
enjoy, and as such contrary to their amenity. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy D6 of the London
Plan (2021) and policy DM13 of the Core Strategy (2012).
3
The proposal would fail to provide cycle parking facilities that are secured, sheltered and adequately lit,
with convenient access to the street. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy T5 of the London Plan
(2021) and Policies CS6 and DM8 of the Core Strategy (2012).
4
The proposed development would discourage the use of sustainable modes of transport through the
relative overprovision of on-site car parking spaces in this particular location. Insufficient information has
been submitted to demonstrate that vehicles would be able to access and egress the site, for the purposes
of utilising the proposed 3 on-site car parking spaces, in a forward gear which could pose highway safety
issues, contrary to Policies T6, T6.1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DM 9 and DM10 of the Kingston
Core Strategy (2012) and the NPPF (2019).
1
The proposed development would fail to provide an appropriate amount of living space in relation to the
size of the properties. This would lead to a cramped form of development that would be detrimental to the
residential amenity of future residents, contrary to policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and policy DM13 of
the Core Strategy (2012).
2
The proposed development would fail to provide an adequate amount of garden space for residents to
enjoy, and as such contrary to their amenity. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy D6 of the London
Plan (2021) and policy DM13 of the Core Strategy (2012).
3
The proposal would fail to provide cycle parking facilities that are secured, sheltered and adequately lit,
with convenient access to the street. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy T5 of the London Plan
(2021) and Policies CS6 and DM8 of the Core Strategy (2012).
Show all 4 rows
4
The proposed development would discourage the use of sustainable modes of transport through the
relative overprovision of on-site car parking spaces in this particular location. Insufficient information has
been submitted to demonstrate that vehicles would be able to access and egress the site, for the purposes
of utilising the proposed 3 on-site car parking spaces, in a forward gear which could pose highway safety
issues, contrary to Policies T6, T6.1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DM 9 and DM10 of the Kingston
Core Strategy (2012) and the NPPF (2019).
Policies cited
D6DM13T5CS6DM8T6T6.1DM9DM10NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.