Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesSurbiton Hill - OLD wardKT6 7AQ294 Ewell Road Surbiton KT6 7AQ20/02272/FUL
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

20/02272/FUL.

294 Ewell Road Surbiton KT6 7AQ

Full / Other Planning at 294 Ewell Road Surbiton KT6 7AQ, received 15 Sep 2020 — refused on 17 Nov 2021 (delegated, Helen Harris).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Nov 2021
61 wks
Decision time
53 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of aluminium and glass cover to replace existing awning over decking area to front of the restaurant

Reference
20/02272/FUL
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
15 Sep 2020
Target date
10 Nov 2020
Decision date
17 Nov 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
20/02272/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
15 Sep 2020
Target date
10 Nov 2020
Decision date
17 Nov 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL
17 Nov 2021
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
15 Sept 2020
031602 EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANS
15 Sept 2020
031603 EXISTING AND PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
15 Sept 2020
031601 SITE LOCATOIN AND BLOCK PLANS
15 Sept 2020
031604 EXISTING AND PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
15 Sept 2020
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL
17 Nov 2021
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
15 Sept 2020
031602 EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANS
15 Sept 2020
Show all 6 rows
031603 EXISTING AND PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
15 Sept 2020
031601 SITE LOCATOIN AND BLOCK PLANS
15 Sept 2020
031604 EXISTING AND PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
15 Sept 2020

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 Nov 2021, delegated decision by Helen Harris — 61 weeks from submission (53 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Sep 2020
Application received
10 Nov 2020
Statutory target date
17 Nov 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Helen Harris
15 Sep 2020
Application received
10 Nov 2020
Statutory target date
17 Nov 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Helen Harris

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its siting and design, would be an unduly prominent and incongruous feature within the Ewell Road street scene, resulting in unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies CS8 and DM10 of the LDF Core Strategy (2012).
1
The proposed development, by reason of its siting and design, would be an unduly prominent and incongruous feature within the Ewell Road street scene, resulting in unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies CS8 and DM10 of the LDF Core Strategy (2012).
Policies cited
D3CS8DM10

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.