Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames
21/03658/FUL.
240 Kingston Vale London SW15 3PT
Full / Other Planning at 240 Kingston Vale London SW15 3PT, received 17 Nov 2021 — refused on 13 Jan 2022 (delegated, William Flaherty).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 Jan 2022
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of existing bungalow and erection of new two storey house with associated landscaping, parking provision and refuse/recycling facilities
Reference
21/03658/FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW15 3PT
Council
Received
17 Nov 2021
Target date
12 Jan 2022
Decision date
13 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
21/03658/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SW15 3PT
Council
Received
17 Nov 2021
Target date
12 Jan 2022
Decision date
13 Jan 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 13 Jan 2022, delegated decision by William Flaherty — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
17 Nov 2021
Application received
12 Jan 2022
Statutory target date
13 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · William Flaherty
17 Nov 2021
Application received
12 Jan 2022
Statutory target date
13 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · William Flaherty
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
No biodiversity or ecological assessments have been submitted to demonstrate that the proposal would
not harm protected species and their habitats, contrary to Policies G4, G6 and G7 of the London Plan
(2021), Policies DM5, DM6, DM10 and DM12 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012), The Wildlife and
Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), The Protection of Badgers Act (1992) and the Conservation of
Habitats and Species Regulations (2017), and Paragraph 180 of the NPPF (2021).
2
No arboricultural information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposal would not harm
mature trees within the application site boundary and on neighbouring sites which positively contribute
towards the character and appearance of the area, contrary to Policies CS8, DM10, DM11 and DM12 of the
Kingston Core Strategy (2012), Policies HC1 and D3 of the London Plan (2021), Section 72 of the Planning
(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and Paragraph 202 of the NPPF (2021).
3
Insufficient robust information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed development would
not result in a significant loss of daylight or sunlight to habitable rooms at neighbouring properties, contrary
to Policy DM10 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012).
4
The provision of on-site car parking spaces in excess of the maximum standards set out in Table 10.3 of
the London Plan (2021) would fail to encourage sustainable modes of travel and diminish the sustainability
of the proposal, contrary to Policy T6.1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DM10 of the Kingston Core
Strategy (2012) and paragraphs 107 and 108 of the NPPF (2021).
1
No biodiversity or ecological assessments have been submitted to demonstrate that the proposal would
not harm protected species and their habitats, contrary to Policies G4, G6 and G7 of the London Plan
(2021), Policies DM5, DM6, DM10 and DM12 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012), The Wildlife and
Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), The Protection of Badgers Act (1992) and the Conservation of
Habitats and Species Regulations (2017), and Paragraph 180 of the NPPF (2021).
2
No arboricultural information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposal would not harm
mature trees within the application site boundary and on neighbouring sites which positively contribute
towards the character and appearance of the area, contrary to Policies CS8, DM10, DM11 and DM12 of the
Kingston Core Strategy (2012), Policies HC1 and D3 of the London Plan (2021), Section 72 of the Planning
(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and Paragraph 202 of the NPPF (2021).
3
Insufficient robust information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed development would
not result in a significant loss of daylight or sunlight to habitable rooms at neighbouring properties, contrary
to Policy DM10 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012).
Show all 4 rows
4
The provision of on-site car parking spaces in excess of the maximum standards set out in Table 10.3 of
the London Plan (2021) would fail to encourage sustainable modes of travel and diminish the sustainability
of the proposal, contrary to Policy T6.1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DM10 of the Kingston Core
Strategy (2012) and paragraphs 107 and 108 of the NPPF (2021).
Policies cited
G4G6G7DM5DM6DM10DM12NPPFCS8DM11HC1D3London Plan 10.3T6.1
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.