Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesChessington South & Malden Rushett wardKT9 2LZBarwell Court Stables Barwell Lane Chessington KT9 2LZ22/00134/FUL
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

22/00134/FUL.

Barwell Court Stables Barwell Lane Chessington KT9 2LZ

Full / Other Planning at Barwell Court Stables Barwell Lane Chessington KT9 2LZ, received 18 Jan 2022 — refused on 29 Dec 2023 (delegated, Helen Harris).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Dec 2023
101 wks
Decision time
93 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a stable to serve the existing equestrian use (Retrospective Application)

Reference
22/00134/FUL
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
18 Jan 2022
Validated
3 Feb 2022
Target date
31 Mar 2022
Decision date
29 Dec 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
22/00134/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
18 Jan 2022
Validated
3 Feb 2022
Target date
31 Mar 2022
Decision date
29 Dec 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 29 Dec 2023, delegated decision by Helen Harris — 101 weeks from submission (93 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Jan 2022
Application received
3 Feb 2022
Application validated
31 Mar 2022
Statutory target date
29 Dec 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Helen Harris
18 Jan 2022
Application received
3 Feb 2022
Application validated
31 Mar 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
29 Dec 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Helen Harris

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.