Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames
22/01113/FUL.
Cambridge Court Cambridge Road Kingston Upon Thames KT1 3LX
Full / Other Planning at Cambridge Court Cambridge Road Kingston Upon Thames KT1 3LX, received 4 Apr 2022 — refused on 30 Jun 2022 (delegated, William Flaherty).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 Jun 2022
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of two additional floors to create 4no. one-bedroom and 2no. three-bedroom self-contained residential units
Reference
22/01113/FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT1 3LX
Ward
Council
Received
4 Apr 2022
Validated
5 May 2022
Target date
30 Jun 2022
Decision date
30 Jun 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
22/01113/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT1 3LX
Ward
Council
Received
4 Apr 2022
Validated
5 May 2022
Target date
30 Jun 2022
Decision date
30 Jun 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 30 Jun 2022, delegated decision by William Flaherty — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
4 Apr 2022
Application received
5 May 2022
Application validated
30 Jun 2022
Statutory target date
30 Jun 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · William Flaherty
4 Apr 2022
Application received
5 May 2022
Application validated
30 Jun 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
30 Jun 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · William Flaherty
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The development would result in a significant loss of daylight and overbearing impact to ground floor flat
windows at No. 444 Kingston Road and would result in a significant loss of privacy, undue sense of
enclosure, overbearing impact and loss of daylight to habitable room windows within Cambridge Court,
contrary to Policies DM10 and DM11 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012).
2
The proposed two-storey upward extension would have a muddle and contrived appearance which
would detract from the character and design of the existing building and the wider area, contrary to Policies
DM10 and DM11 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012) and the NPPF (2021).
3
The proposed 3 bedroom units would fall below the minimum internal areas required by Table 3.1 of the
London Plan (2021), the proposed bedrooms for these flats would fall below the minimum width
requirements set out in the Nationally Described Space Standards (2015) and insufficient amenity space
would be provided for the residents of Cambridge Court (existing and proposed), contrary to Policies DM10
and DM11 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and the Nationally
Described Space Standard (2015).
1
The development would result in a significant loss of daylight and overbearing impact to ground floor flat
windows at No. 444 Kingston Road and would result in a significant loss of privacy, undue sense of
enclosure, overbearing impact and loss of daylight to habitable room windows within Cambridge Court,
contrary to Policies DM10 and DM11 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012).
2
The proposed two-storey upward extension would have a muddle and contrived appearance which
would detract from the character and design of the existing building and the wider area, contrary to Policies
DM10 and DM11 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012) and the NPPF (2021).
3
The proposed 3 bedroom units would fall below the minimum internal areas required by Table 3.1 of the
London Plan (2021), the proposed bedrooms for these flats would fall below the minimum width
requirements set out in the Nationally Described Space Standards (2015) and insufficient amenity space
would be provided for the residents of Cambridge Court (existing and proposed), contrary to Policies DM10
and DM11 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and the Nationally
Described Space Standard (2015).
Policies cited
DM10DM11NPPFLondon Plan 3.1D6
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.