Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesNew Malden Village ward23/01013/HOU
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

23/01013/HOU.

14 Hillbrow New Malden KT3 4HT

Householder at 14 Hillbrow New Malden KT3 4HT, received 17 Apr 2023 — refused on 14 Jun 2023 (delegated, Carmellena Hickey).

Kingston Upon ThamesNew Malden VillageKT3 4HT23/01013/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Jun 2023
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey front porch, side/rear wrap around extension. Formation of a new dropped kerb and hardstanding.

Reference
23/01013/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT3 4HT
Received
17 Apr 2023
Validated
24 Apr 2023
Target date
19 Jun 2023
Decision date
14 Jun 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
23/01013/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT3 4HT
Received
17 Apr 2023
Validated
24 Apr 2023
Target date
19 Jun 2023
Decision date
14 Jun 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal Decision
2 Jan 2024
Despatch Cover Letter
2 Jan 2024
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - HOU
14 Jun 2023
HB-00 REV A
24 Apr 2023
HB-01 REV A
24 Apr 2023
HB-02 REV C
24 Apr 2023
HB-06 REV D
24 Apr 2023
Application Form (No personal data)
17 Apr 2023
Appeal Decision
2 Jan 2024
Despatch Cover Letter
2 Jan 2024
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - HOU
14 Jun 2023
Show all 8 rows
HB-00 REV A
24 Apr 2023
HB-01 REV A
24 Apr 2023
HB-02 REV C
24 Apr 2023
HB-06 REV D
24 Apr 2023
Application Form (No personal data)
17 Apr 2023

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 14 Jun 2023, delegated decision by Carmellena Hickey — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
17 Apr 2023
Application received
24 Apr 2023
Application validated
19 Jun 2023
Statutory target date
14 Jun 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Carmellena Hickey
17 Apr 2023
Application received
24 Apr 2023
Application validated
19 Jun 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Jun 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Carmellena Hickey

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The applicant has failed to demonstrate through the submission of cogent evidence that the proposed vehicular crossover would not harm the health and longevity of the immediately adjacent street trees, which would have an unacceptable adverse impact on the quality of the public realm within Hillbrow and the character and appearance of the street and the wider area, thereby conflicting with Paragraph 131 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2021, Policies CS8 and DM10 of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2012, Policy G7 of the London Plan 2021 and guidance in the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Residential Design Guide SPD 2013.
1
The applicant has failed to demonstrate through the submission of cogent evidence that the proposed vehicular crossover would not harm the health and longevity of the immediately adjacent street trees, which would have an unacceptable adverse impact on the quality of the public realm within Hillbrow and the character and appearance of the street and the wider area, thereby conflicting with Paragraph 131 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2021, Policies CS8 and DM10 of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2012, Policy G7 of the London Plan 2021 and guidance in the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Residential Design Guide SPD 2013.
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 131G7NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.