Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesCoombe Hill ward23/01633/HOU
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

23/01633/HOU.

Acorn House 149A Coombe Lane West Kingston Upon Thames KT2 7DH

Householder at Acorn House 149A Coombe Lane West Kingston Upon Thames KT2 7DH, received 19 Jun 2023 — refused on 14 Sep 2023 (delegated, Gosia Danik).

Kingston Upon ThamesCoombe HillKT2 7DH23/01633/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Sep 2023
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of existing bin storage, erection of a single storey carport. Replacement of existing entrance gate. Fenestration alteration.

Reference
23/01633/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT2 7DH
Received
19 Jun 2023
Validated
20 Jul 2023
Target date
14 Sep 2023
Decision date
14 Sep 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
23/01633/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT2 7DH
Received
19 Jun 2023
Validated
20 Jul 2023
Target date
14 Sep 2023
Decision date
14 Sep 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - HOU
14 Sept 2023
(WD)06
13 Jul 2023
(WD)05
27 Jun 2023
Application Form (No personal data)
19 Jun 2023
Location Plan
19 Jun 2023
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - HOU
14 Sept 2023
(WD)06
13 Jul 2023
(WD)05
27 Jun 2023
Show all 5 rows
Application Form (No personal data)
19 Jun 2023
Location Plan
19 Jun 2023

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 14 Sep 2023, delegated decision by Gosia Danik — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Jun 2023
Application received
20 Jul 2023
Application validated
14 Sep 2023
Statutory target date
14 Sep 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Gosia Danik
19 Jun 2023
Application received
20 Jul 2023
Application validated
14 Sep 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Sep 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Gosia Danik

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed carport would not result in an unacceptable adverse impact upon the longevity, health and appearance of the surrounding trees which contribute positively to the significance of the and Coombe Hill Conservation Area. It has not been demonstrated that the proposals would preserve the character and appearance of the Coombe Hill Conservation Area and that the proposals would not harm any protected trees and the development is therefore contrary to Policies D3, HC1 and G7 of the London Plan (2021) and policies CS8, DM10 and DM12 of the Council's adopted LDF Core Strategy April 2012.
1
Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed carport would not result in an unacceptable adverse impact upon the longevity, health and appearance of the surrounding trees which contribute positively to the significance of the and Coombe Hill Conservation Area. It has not been demonstrated that the proposals would preserve the character and appearance of the Coombe Hill Conservation Area and that the proposals would not harm any protected trees and the development is therefore contrary to Policies D3, HC1 and G7 of the London Plan (2021) and policies CS8, DM10 and DM12 of the Council's adopted LDF Core Strategy April 2012.
Policies cited
D3HC1G7CS8DM10DM12

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.