Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesBerrylands ward24/01930/FUL
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

24/01930/FUL.

96 And 96A Alexandra Drive Surbiton KT5 9AG

Full / Other Planning at 96 And 96A Alexandra Drive Surbiton KT5 9AG, received 6 Aug 2024 — refused on 5 Sep 2025 (delegated, Carmellena Hickey).

Kingston Upon ThamesBerrylandsKT5 9AG24/01930/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Sep 2025
56 wks
Decision time
48 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Subdivision of existing 2 bed flat into 1 x 1 bed flat and 1 x studio flat

Reference
24/01930/FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT5 9AG
Received
6 Aug 2024
Validated
23 Aug 2024
Target date
18 Oct 2024
Decision date
5 Sep 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
24/01930/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT5 9AG
Received
6 Aug 2024
Validated
23 Aug 2024
Target date
18 Oct 2024
Decision date
5 Sep 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal Decision
4 Mar 2026
officer report
8 Sept 2025
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL
5 Sept 2025
Application Form (No personal data)
6 Aug 2024
002
6 Aug 2024
004
6 Aug 2024
003
6 Aug 2024
01.001 PL2
6 Aug 2024
01.003 PL2
6 Aug 2024
01.004 PL2
6 Aug 2024
Appeal Decision
4 Mar 2026
officer report
8 Sept 2025
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL
5 Sept 2025
Show all 10 rows
Application Form (No personal data)
6 Aug 2024
002
6 Aug 2024
004
6 Aug 2024
003
6 Aug 2024
01.001 PL2
6 Aug 2024
01.003 PL2
6 Aug 2024
01.004 PL2
6 Aug 2024

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 Sep 2025, delegated decision by Carmellena Hickey — 56 weeks from submission (48 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Aug 2024
Application received
23 Aug 2024
Application validated
18 Oct 2024
Statutory target date
5 Sep 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Carmellena Hickey
6 Aug 2024
Application received
23 Aug 2024
Application validated
18 Oct 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 Sep 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Carmellena Hickey

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Insufficient evidence, in the form of a comprehensive Section Plan, has been submitted to demonstrate the second floor dwelling would achieve a minimum 2.5m floor ceiling height for at least 75% of the Gross Internal Area and would provide an adequate standard of accommodation for future occupants, contrary to to Policy DM10 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012) and Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021).
1
Insufficient evidence, in the form of a comprehensive Section Plan, has been submitted to demonstrate the second floor dwelling would achieve a minimum 2.5m floor ceiling height for at least 75% of the Gross Internal Area and would provide an adequate standard of accommodation for future occupants, contrary to to Policy DM10 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012) and Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021).
Policies cited
DM10D6

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.