Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesSt Mark's & Seething Wells ward25/02053/PAMA
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

25/02053/PAMA.

Onslow House 1 Crummock Chase Surbiton Kingston Upon Thames KT6 4NP

Other at Onslow House 1 Crummock Chase Surbiton Kingston Upon Thames KT6 4NP, received 4 Aug 2025 — refused on 24 Dec 2025 (delegated, Joel Turner).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Dec 2025
20 wks
Decision time
12 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use of first floor ancillary office space (Use Class E) into 1no. three bedroom flat (Use Class C3)

Reference
25/02053/PAMA
Type
PA Class MA - Change from Class E to C3
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
KT6 4NP
Received
4 Aug 2025
Validated
28 Aug 2025
Target date
23 Oct 2025
Decision date
24 Dec 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
25/02053/PAMA
Type
PA Class MA - Change from Class E to C3
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
KT6 4NP
Received
4 Aug 2025
Validated
28 Aug 2025
Target date
23 Oct 2025
Decision date
24 Dec 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - PAMA
24 Dec 2025
2700-12 B
28 Aug 2025
1724-02C
13 Aug 2025
2700-01C
13 Aug 2025
2700-02 B
13 Aug 2025
2700-06 C
13 Aug 2025
2700-10 B
13 Aug 2025
Unilateral Deed
11 Aug 2025
Application Form (No personal data)
4 Aug 2025
Ownership Certificate A
4 Aug 2025
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - PAMA
24 Dec 2025
2700-12 B
28 Aug 2025
1724-02C
13 Aug 2025
Show all 10 rows
2700-01C
13 Aug 2025
2700-02 B
13 Aug 2025
2700-06 C
13 Aug 2025
2700-10 B
13 Aug 2025
Unilateral Deed
11 Aug 2025
Application Form (No personal data)
4 Aug 2025
Ownership Certificate A
4 Aug 2025

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Dec 2025, delegated decision by Joel Turner — 20 weeks from submission (12 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Aug 2025
Application received
28 Aug 2025
Application validated
23 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
24 Dec 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Joel Turner
4 Aug 2025
Application received
28 Aug 2025
Application validated
23 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
24 Dec 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Joel Turner

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development does not benefit from the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended), due to its location within an Article 4 Direction area which requires the submission of a planning application for the change of use from Class E to residential use. As such, the proposal would constitute development for which an application for planning permission is required.
1
The proposed development does not benefit from the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended), due to its location within an Article 4 Direction area which requires the submission of a planning application for the change of use from Class E to residential use. As such, the proposal would constitute development for which an application for planning permission is required.

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.