Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesNew Malden Village ward25/03270/FUL
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

25/03270/FUL.

Fountain House 10 Burlington Road New Malden KT3 4NY

Full / Other Planning at Fountain House 10 Burlington Road New Malden KT3 4NY, received 19 Dec 2025 — refused on 13 Mar 2026 (delegated, Gosia Danik).

Kingston Upon ThamesNew Malden VillageKT3 4NY25/03270/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 Mar 2026
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of first floor side extension with installation of photovoltaic panels to extension roof.

Reference
25/03270/FUL
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT3 4NY
Received
19 Dec 2025
Validated
16 Jan 2026
Target date
13 Mar 2026
Decision date
13 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
25/03270/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT3 4NY
Received
19 Dec 2025
Validated
16 Jan 2026
Target date
13 Mar 2026
Decision date
13 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL
13 Mar 2026
TP 12 01 A
16 Jan 2026
TP 11 01 A
16 Jan 2026
TP 10 02 A
16 Jan 2026
TP 10 01 A
16 Jan 2026
Application Form (No personal data)
19 Dec 2025
SU 00 01
19 Dec 2025
SU 11 01
19 Dec 2025
SU 10 01
19 Dec 2025
SU 10 02
19 Dec 2025
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL
13 Mar 2026
TP 12 01 A
16 Jan 2026
TP 11 01 A
16 Jan 2026
Show all 10 rows
TP 10 02 A
16 Jan 2026
TP 10 01 A
16 Jan 2026
Application Form (No personal data)
19 Dec 2025
SU 00 01
19 Dec 2025
SU 11 01
19 Dec 2025
SU 10 01
19 Dec 2025
SU 10 02
19 Dec 2025

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 13 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Gosia Danik — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Dec 2025
Application received
16 Jan 2026
Application validated
13 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
13 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Gosia Danik
19 Dec 2025
Application received
16 Jan 2026
Application validated
13 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
13 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Gosia Danik

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor side extension, by reason of its siting, lack of setback from the front elevation, inappropriate roof form and use of materials, would fail to relate satisfactorily to the architectural composition of the host building and would appear as an incongruous and visually dominant addition within the street scene. The development would therefore harm the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area, contrary to Paragraph 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021) and Policy DM10 of the Council's Core Strategy (2012).
1
The proposed first floor side extension, by reason of its siting, lack of setback from the front elevation, inappropriate roof form and use of materials, would fail to relate satisfactorily to the architectural composition of the host building and would appear as an incongruous and visually dominant addition within the street scene. The development would therefore harm the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area, contrary to Paragraph 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021) and Policy DM10 of the Council's Core Strategy (2012).
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 135D3DM10NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.