Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesKing George's & Sunray ward26/00636/HOU
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

26/00636/HOU.

70 Warren Drive South Surbiton KT5 9QE

Householder at 70 Warren Drive South Surbiton KT5 9QE, received 24 Mar 2026 — approved on 13 May 2026 (delegated, Gosia Danik).

Kingston Upon ThamesKing George's & SunrayKT5 9QE26/00636/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
13 May 2026
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear lean to extension

Reference
26/00636/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT5 9QE
Received
24 Mar 2026
Validated
25 Mar 2026
Target date
20 May 2026
Decision date
13 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Granted
Reference
26/00636/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT5 9QE
Received
24 Mar 2026
Validated
25 Mar 2026
Target date
20 May 2026
Decision date
13 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Granted
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 13 May 2026, delegated decision by Gosia Danik — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Mar 2026
Application received
25 Mar 2026
Application validated
20 May 2026
Statutory target date
13 May 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Gosia Danik
24 Mar 2026
Application received
25 Mar 2026
Application validated
20 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
13 May 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Gosia Danik

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.