Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames
26/00753/PAEXT.
21 Hunters Road Chessington KT9 1RX
Householder at 21 Hunters Road Chessington KT9 1RX, received 9 Apr 2026 — refused on 21 May 2026 (delegated, Honey Olaiya).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 May 2026
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of single storey rear extension (8.0m in depth, maximum height of 3.0m and eaves height of 2.40m)
Reference
26/00753/PAEXT
Type
PA Householder Rear Extension
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT9 1RX
Council
Received
9 Apr 2026
Target date
21 May 2026
Decision date
21 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
26/00753/PAEXT
Type
PA Householder Rear Extension
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT9 1RX
Council
Received
9 Apr 2026
Target date
21 May 2026
Decision date
21 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 21 May 2026, delegated decision by Honey Olaiya — 6 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
9 Apr 2026
Application received
21 May 2026
Statutory target date
21 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Honey Olaiya
9 Apr 2026
Application received
21 May 2026
Statutory target date
21 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Honey Olaiya
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
By virtue of the complete omission of existing and proposed elevation drawings together with roof
profiles, the submission fails to provide the necessary architectural and contextual data required for
the local planning authority to assess the impact of an 8.0 metre rearward projection on the
residential amenities of the adjoining occupiers at No. 23 Hunters Road. In the absence of these
vital details, and following a material objection from an adjoining neighbour regarding boundary
massing and overbearing impact, the local planning authority cannot satisfy itself that the
development would safeguard neighbouring residential amenity. The proposal is therefore contrary
to the requirements of Class A, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General
Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).
1
By virtue of the complete omission of existing and proposed elevation drawings together with roof
profiles, the submission fails to provide the necessary architectural and contextual data required for
the local planning authority to assess the impact of an 8.0 metre rearward projection on the
residential amenities of the adjoining occupiers at No. 23 Hunters Road. In the absence of these
vital details, and following a material objection from an adjoining neighbour regarding boundary
massing and overbearing impact, the local planning authority cannot satisfy itself that the
development would safeguard neighbouring residential amenity. The proposal is therefore contrary
to the requirements of Class A, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General
Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.