Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames
26/00862/HOU.
91 Elgar Avenue Surbiton KT5 9JS
Householder at 91 Elgar Avenue Surbiton KT5 9JS, received 22 Apr 2026 — pending consideration.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Pending Consideration
Outcome
no decision date
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
19
Documents
19 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of single storey rear extension
Reference
26/00862/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT5 9JS
Ward
Council
Received
22 Apr 2026
Validated
6 May 2026
Target date
1 Jul 2026
Decision date
—
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Pending Consideration
Council register
Reference
26/00862/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT5 9JS
Ward
Council
Received
22 Apr 2026
Validated
6 May 2026
Target date
1 Jul 2026
Decision date
—
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Pending Consideration
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Status: Pending Consideration. No decision is recorded yet.
Timeline
Date
Event
22 Apr 2026
Application received
6 May 2026
Application validated
1 Jul 2026
Statutory target date
22 Apr 2026
Application received
6 May 2026
Application validated
1 Jul 2026
Statutory target date
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.