Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesKT9 2HP07/10293/TPO
Planning application · Kingston Upon Thames

07/10293/TPO.

St Philips School Chessington Hall Gardens Chessington KT9 2HP

Trees at St Philips School Chessington Hall Gardens Chessington KT9 2HP, received 13 Nov 2007 — not required on 6 Dec 2007.

Kingston Upon ThamesKT9 2HP07/10293/TPO
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationKingston Upon Thames profile →
Not required
Outcome
6 Dec 2007
3 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

DTN - Fell one Oak (T.1), one Lime (T.43) and surgery work to three Lime trees (T.3, T.42 & T.44) (RBK.20.81)

Reference
07/10293/TPO
Type
Tree Preservation Order
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Received
13 Nov 2007
Target date
8 Jan 2008
Decision date
6 Dec 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
07/10293/TPO
Type
Tree Preservation Order
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Received
13 Nov 2007
Target date
8 Jan 2008
Decision date
6 Dec 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
6 Dec 2007
Decision Notice
6 Dec 2007

Documents open on the Kingston Upon Thames portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Not required on 6 Dec 2007 — 3 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Nov 2007
Application received
8 Jan 2008
Statutory target date
6 Dec 2007
Delegated decision: Not required
13 Nov 2007
Application received
8 Jan 2008
Statutory target date
6 Dec 2007
Delegated decision: Not required

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.